马克思实践思想对主观自由和客观自由的扬弃

发布时间：2018-01-27 07:29

  本文关键词： 自由 实体 主体 实践主体　出处：《现代哲学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在近代主客二分的哲学体系里,主体性的规范通常被认为是自由现实化的障碍。黑格尔的客观唯心主义体系打破了这一传统,他的绝对精神融主客为一体,人的自由意志受制于绝对精神的控制,人们不能脱离社会整体去获取个体的自由,这一点为马克思所继承。但马克思认为主体与客体的统一不是在精神层面实现的,而是在劳动实践中实现的,从而将黑格尔的精神实体改造为实践主体,生产者是现实社会价值创造者同时也应该成为价值享用者,社会制度的设计应该有利于超验的自由照进现实世界。马克思认为人是社会现实物质生产的一员,人只能而且必须通过群体的现实力量逐步实现现实自由,他认定发挥人的主体意志改造客观世界能够获得自由,但反对用施蒂纳式主观个体化眼光来看待现实性的自由。
[Abstract]:In the modern philosophy system, the norm of subjectivity is usually regarded as an obstacle to the realization of freedom. Hegel's objective idealism system breaks this tradition, and his absolute spirit combines subject and object as a whole. The free will of man is subject to the control of absolute spirit, and one cannot obtain individual freedom from the whole society. But Marx thought that the unity of subject and object was not realized in the spiritual level, but in the labor practice, thus transforming Hegel's spiritual entity into the practice subject. Producers are the creators of social values and should also be value users. The design of social system should be conducive to transcendental freedom of exposure to the real world. Marx believes that man is a member of the social reality of material production. Man can only and must gradually realize the freedom of reality through the real power of the group, and he believes that he can obtain freedom by exerting the will of the subject to transform the objective world. But it opposes the freedom to look at reality in Steiner's subjective individualized view.
【正文快照】： 马克思实践思想对主观自由和客观自由的扬弃 林福山 【 摘要 】 在近代主客二分的哲学体系里，主体性的规范通常被认为是自由现实化的障碍 。 黑格尔的客观唯 心主义体系打破了这一传统，他的绝对精神融主客为一体，人的自由意志受制于绝对精神的控制，，人们不 能脱离

本文编号：1467958