以性恶论说荀子的困境及其摆脱

发布时间：2018-02-11 00:53

  本文关键词： 《性恶》 荀子 荀子后学　出处：《现代哲学》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：表述于《荀子》一书的性恶论与荀子其人在人们心中具有高度的关联性。但是,该书并非全为他一人所写。前贤以性恶论说荀子,陷入重重困境,有人欲摆脱困境,结果又陷入新的困境。回到刘向编该书时把《性恶》夹在《子道》与《法行》之间本来的位置,不视之为一篇独立、完整的论说文,而以之为杂言杂语,这是摆脱这些困境的好方法。《性恶》不是荀子所作,而是其后学与人性有关的不同言论的汇集,它反映了后学对人性看法的分歧:有人以人性为恶,有人不以人性为恶。
[Abstract]:The theory of sexual evil expressed in Xunzi is highly related to Xunzi's people. However, the book is not all written by him alone. The former sages used the theory of sexual evil to say that Xunzi was in a lot of trouble, and some people wanted to get rid of it. As a result, Liu Xiang got into a new predicament. Back to Liu Xiang's original position of "sexual evil" between "Zi Dao" and "Dharma" when he compiled the book, he did not regard it as an independent and complete essay, but instead regarded it as a mixed language. This is a good way to get rid of these predicaments. "sexual evil" is not by Xunzi, but a collection of different opinions about human nature. It reflects the difference of views on human nature: some people regard humanity as evil, others do not regard human nature as evil.
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学政治与行政学院国学研究中心;
【分类号】：B222.6
，

本文编号：1501849