阿多诺对海德格尔存在论的内在批判

发布时间：2018-02-16 01:11

本文关键词： 存在存在论非同一性阿多诺海德格尔　出处：《学术月刊》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：阿多诺从内在的角度批判了海德格尔的存在论。他认为海德格尔的存在论把系词名词化,把系词从句子中独立出来,从而表达句子中主宾词之间的密切联系、不可还原性和超越性,但是这种做法实际上是把不可还原性还原了,是脱离了被超越的东西来谈超越。当然海德格尔试图用"存在"这个概念来表达非同一性,但是他却用具有同一性特征的"存在"概念来表达非同一性,这实际上就是像实证主义那样直接表达名词所涉及的东西,而非同一性的东西是不能被直接表达的。虽然海德格尔试图把存在和存在者区别开来,提出了存在者状态的概念,这个存在者状态实际上就是要表达非同一性的东西,但这其实就是"存在"要表达的东西,因此,他的存在者状态的概念实际上也存在论化了。他所提出的"此在"实际上也只能在存在的意义上理解,而这个存在论意义上理解的此在之生存具有独断论的特征。阿多诺对海德格尔的批判为我们思考马克思主义存在论提供了有益的参考。
[Abstract]:Adorno criticizes Heidegger's existentialism from an intrinsic perspective. He believes that Heidegger's existentialism nominalizes bound words and separates them from sentences, thus expressing the close relationship between subject-object words in sentences. Irreducible and transcendent, but this is actually a reduction of irreducibility, of course, to talk about transcendence from what is transcended. Of course, Heidegger is trying to use the concept of "being" to express non-identity. But he uses the concept of "being" with identity to express non-identity, which is actually what nouns are concerned with, as is the case with positivism. Although Heidegger tried to distinguish the existence from the being, he proposed the concept of the state of the being, which is actually to express the non-identity. But this is what "being" is meant to express, so the concept of the state of his being is actually existential.His "being" actually can only be understood in the sense of being. The existence of this existentialism, understood in the sense of ontology, is characterized by arbitrariness. Adorno's criticism of Heidegger provides a useful reference for us to think about Marxist existentialism.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B516.54

【相似文献】