主体、权力和反抗

发布时间：2018-03-11 19:23

本文选题：主体　切入点：权力　出处：《马克思主义与现实》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：主体的悖论深刻地隐含了权力、主体和反抗之间的棘手关系。阿尔都塞最先深入探讨了主体的生产与意识形态国家机器之间的密切关系。作为马克思主义的批判者,福柯更加强调权力的生产性和无主体性,反对将主体的生产联系于国家和统治阶级的意识形态来加以考察。尽管福柯与阿尔都塞具有深刻的差异,但二者都是从外在的权力方面来思考主体的辩证法,没有充分考虑到权力机制在建构臣民时所遭到的反抗。巴特勒敏锐地发现了主体对权力机制无意识的强烈依恋,认为左翼政治的使命在于寻找真正能够反抗权力秩序的根本策略。但在齐泽克看来,她所寻找的激进反抗其实并不激进。德勒兹和瓜塔里的微观欲望政治学也尝试提出一种真正有效的反抗策略,因为他们彻底颠覆了宏观政治和微观政治的虚假对立。但是,他们所提倡的精神分裂,根本而言也只是一种无从实现的假设,因为它本身就是目的而非手段。
[Abstract]:The paradox of the subject deeply implies the thorny relationship between power, subject and resistance. Althusser first explored the close relationship between the production of the subject and the ideological state machine. As a critic of Marxism, Althusser first explored the close relationship between the production of the subject and the ideological state machine. Foucault put more emphasis on the productive and non-subjectivity of power and opposed to examining the production of the subject in relation to the ideology of the state and the ruling class, despite the profound differences between Foucault and Althusser. However, both of them think about the dialectics of the subject from the external power aspect, without fully considering the resistance of the power mechanism in the construction of subjects. Butler is keenly aware of the unconscious attachment of the subject to the power mechanism. The mission of left-wing politics is to find a fundamental strategy that can really resist the order of power. But in Zizek's view, The radical revolt she was looking for was not, in fact, radical. The microcosmic lust politics of Delez and Guatari also tried to come up with a really effective strategy for resistance, because they completely overturned the false opposition between macro and micro politics. But, The schizophrenia they advocate is essentially an unattainable assumption, because it is an end in itself, not a means.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学文学院;
【分类号】：B03

【相似文献】