二语习得研究的后现代哲学审视

发布时间：2018-03-16 11:18

本文选题：二语习得　切入点：后现代哲学　出处：《外语学刊》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：钱冠连和王寅最近提出“语言哲学家在第二次哲学启蒙的时点上如何自处”和如何将中国后语言哲学“作为我国语言学界的本土理论加以打造”的问题。本文在后现代哲学视野中考察二语习得的研究现状,认为当前的二语习得研究在“本体论承诺”上过分囿于内在主义的语言能力观和二语习得机制的先天预成立场,在“认识论承诺”上过分囿于个体大脑中心主义的认知观,在“方法论承诺”上过分囿于单元主义的真理观与方法论;亟需采取后现代哲学多视角主义和多元主义的真理观与方法论,以突破当前的藩篱,获得更加广阔的发展前景。这是对“是哲学的,定能为语言研究所用;是语言的,必然关涉哲学理论”立场的一种回应,也是二语习得研究参与第二次哲学启蒙的一种尝试。
[Abstract]:Qian Guanlian and Wang Yin have recently raised the questions of "how do language philosophers find themselves at the point of the second philosophical enlightenment" and how to build Chinese post-linguistic philosophy as the local theory of Chinese linguists? From the perspective of postmodern philosophy, the present situation of second language acquisition is investigated. It is believed that the present study of second language acquisition is too limited by the view of language competence of the internalism and the innate preposition of the mechanism of second language acquisition on the ontological commitment, and the cognitive view of the individual brain centralism on the "epistemological commitment". "Methodology commitment" is too limited to the truth view and methodology of unit doctrine, and it is urgent to adopt the truth view and methodology of post-modern philosophy multi-perspective doctrine and pluralism in order to break through the current barriers. This is a response to the standpoint that "it is philosophy, which is bound to be used by linguistic research, and is necessarily concerned with philosophical theory", and it is also an attempt by the second language acquisition study to participate in the second philosophical enlightenment.
【作者单位】：四川外国语大学;
【分类号】：H09;B089

【相似文献】