精神分析理论的三个偏颇——德勒兹的一种批判性分析

发布时间：2018-03-17 13:47

本文选题：精神分析　切入点：家庭主义　出处：《学术交流》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：德勒兹从三方面批判精神分析理论。其一,他批判精神分析的家庭主义立场。精神分析从狭隘的家庭主义立场来解释社会现象,认为人类文明起源于乱伦禁戒,而宗教和道德是阻止乱伦的现实尝试。其二,他认为,精神分析对俄狄浦斯的理论构建标志着自身的唯心化转向,它赋予了俄狄浦斯始源性的角色,试图用俄狄浦斯解释一切社会现象,所有的言行都简化为"爸爸-妈妈-我"三角结构关系的各种表象。其三,他认为,精神分析歪曲了欲望的本性,欲望的生产性仅仅停留于想象界或幻想界,欲望的生产性被还原为剧场的表象,导致革命性的欲望退化为俄狄浦斯欲望,即乱伦欲望。在他看来,精神分析在某种程度上已堕落为资本主义的意识形态。
[Abstract]:Deleuz criticizes psychoanalytic theory from three aspects. First, he criticizes the family standpoint of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis interprets social phenomena from a narrow family-ism standpoint, and holds that human civilization originated from incest. Religion and morality are realistic attempts to prevent incest. Second, he believes that psychoanalysis's theoretical construction of Oedipus marks its idealistic turn, which gives Oedipus the role of originality. Trying to explain all social phenomena in Oedipus, all words and deeds are reduced to the various manifestations of the triangular structure of the "papa-mummy" relationship. Third, he believes that psychoanalysis distorts the nature of desire. The production of desire is confined only to the realm of imagination or fantasy, and the production of desire is restored to the appearance of the theatre, leading to the degenerating of revolutionary desire into Oedipus desire, that is, incest desire. In his view, To some extent, psychoanalysis has degenerated into capitalist ideology.
【作者单位】：郑州大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“德勒兹欲望政治哲学研究”(13CZX060) 河南省意识形态与社会治理优势特色学科郑州大学意识形态安全研究中心招标课题“当代法国哲学的意识形态问题研究”(YSXT-2017-021)
【分类号】：B565.59

【相似文献】