以《内篇》参观之——王船山对庄子与其后学的分疏

发布时间：2018-03-28 02:29

本文选题：王船山　切入点：庄子　出处：《中国哲学史》2017年02期

【摘要】：作为其庄子定位论的重要内容,船山对庄子与其后学的分疏是通过对《庄子》各篇进行文本辨伪和思想澄清来完成的。在他看来,《庄子》全书只有内篇和杂篇之《寓言》《天下》为庄子所作,内七篇意皆连属、别为一宗,是庄子思想的系统表达,《寓言》《天下》二篇则为其书之"序例";除此九篇,其余皆为他人作品。为廓清庄子与后学的差异,船山以"浑天"为终极视域,参照内篇的思想要旨和文本特点,逐一疏解了纯驳相间的外篇和博引泛记的杂篇,并从中剥离出了为老子作训诂者、黄老、形名、乐死、养生等非庄子思想。他对庄子思想的重构,正是以内篇为基础,通过批评外杂篇中那些偏离庄子之旨的作品,同时表彰那些发明庄子真义的作品而实现的。
[Abstract]:As an important part of Zhuangzi's positioning theory, Chuanshan's separation of Zhuangzi and his later studies was accomplished by discriminating the texts of Zhuangzi and clarifying his thoughts. In his opinion, Zhuangzi's whole book has only the inner and miscellaneous "fables" and "the world" written by Zhuangzi, and all seven of them belong to Zhuangzi. The other one is the systematic expression of Zhuangzi's thought, and the second part of "Fable" is the "preface" of his book; except these nine, the rest are all works of others. In order to clarify the difference between Zhuangzi and later learning, Chuanshan regards "muddy sky" as the ultimate horizon. Referring to the ideological tenor and the characteristics of the text in the inner part, the author uncovers one by one the pure refutation of the outer part and the miscellaneous text of the Bo quotation, and strips out the exegesis for Laozi, Huang Lao, form and name, and happy death. His reconstruction of Zhuangzi's thought is based on the inner text, which is realized by criticizing those works that deviate from Zhuangzi's purpose in the miscellaneous articles, and commending those works that invented Zhuangzi's true meaning at the same time.
【作者单位】：山东大学易学与中国古代哲学研究中心;山东大学哲学与社会发展学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“《庄子》篇义题解辑要与研究”(12JJD720003) 国家社会科学基金项目“明遗民士群之儒家庄学研究”(11BZX041)
【分类号】：B223.5

【相似文献】