“图型”与“类型”——透视康德与胡塞尔的先验哲学

发布时间：2018-03-30 15:13

本文选题：图型　切入点：类型　出处：《社会科学》2017年04期

【摘要】：图型与类型分别在康德和胡塞尔的哲学体系中占据着极为重要的位置,但是国内学界对于图型、类型的关注,尤其是对于胡塞尔的类型的关注还明显不足,对于二者之间关系的探讨也很少看到。在此,我们本着客观公正的态度,按照现象学“回到实事本身”的原则,借助于日常生活中最为实际、最为简单的事例,来对康德的“图型”和胡塞尔的“类型”学说进行澄清,指明图型与类型在他们各自的哲学体系中所占据的重要的地位和作用。在此基础上,以图型与类型为视角,来透视康德和胡塞尔的两种先验哲学体系之间的异同,指明两种先验哲学的优势与困境。从而可以使我们更好地理解胡塞尔的“先验”对于康德的“先验”的继承与突破。
[Abstract]:Graph and type occupy an extremely important position in Kant's and Husserl's philosophy system respectively, but the attention of domestic academic circles on graph type and type, especially on Husserl's type, is obviously insufficient. There is little discussion of the relationship between the two. Here, in an objective and impartial manner, in accordance with the principle of phenomenology of "going back to the facts themselves," we resort to the most practical and simple examples in our daily life. To clarify Kant's "diagram" and Husserl's "type", and to point out the important position and function of graph and type in their respective philosophical systems. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between Kant and Husserl's two transcendental philosophies, and points out the advantages and difficulties of the two transcendental philosophies, so that we can understand better the inheritance and breakthrough of Husserl's transcendence from Kant's transcendence.
【作者单位】：复旦大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B516.31;B516.52

【相似文献】