科玄之争的学术回响——胡适、梁启超墨学阐释的异同离合

发布时间：2018-04-02 13:29

本文选题：胡适　切入点：梁启超　出处：《齐鲁学刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：在清代学术理路和西潮冲击之下,墨子及墨学在清末民初引起知识分子的广泛关注。作为现代学术史上的典范性人物,胡适和梁启超对于墨学的偏爱和阐释可以说具有典范意义,其学术主张存在共同性,同时也存在着差异性。二人都比较重视墨子的《墨辩》部分,以此来发明中国传统学术的"科学精神",但二人对于墨学的理解和阐释也存在根本性差异:一主"智",一重"爱"。以话语分析的视角看,现代性的科学话语和反省现代性的玄学话语构成了胡适和梁启超墨学知识生产的核心要素。可以说,"五四"之后中国思想界对于文化现代化的思索呈现出多岐性,正是对于文化现代性的不同方案导致了胡适和梁启超以及不同学术群体对于传统阐释产生差异。因此,胡适和梁启超关于墨学研究的异同离合可视为近代中国一典型的学术史事件。
[Abstract]:Under the impact of academic theory and western tide in the Qing Dynasty, Mozi and Mohism attracted extensive attention of intellectuals in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China. Hu Shi and Liang Qichao's preference for and interpretation of Mohism can be said to be of exemplary significance, and their academic opinions are common and at the same time different. Both of them attach more importance to the "Mohism" part of Mozi. In order to invent the "scientific spirit" of Chinese traditional learning, however, there are fundamental differences in their understanding and interpretation of Mohism: one master "wisdom" and the other "love". The scientific discourse of modernity and the metaphysical discourse of introspecting modernity constitute the core elements of the knowledge production of Hu Shi and Liang Qichao Mohism. It is the different solutions to cultural modernity that lead to differences between Hu Shi and Liang Qichao, as well as different academic groups in terms of traditional interpretation. The similarities and differences between Hu Shi and Liang Qichao on the study of Mohism can be regarded as a typical academic event in modern China.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：B224

【参考文献】