庄子的“至言”与尼采的“谎言”比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-14 03:14

本文选题：至言 + 谎言　；参考：《聊城大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文是比较研究庄子与尼采的“至言”与“谎言”，，全文分为前言、正文和结语三部分。前言部分论述了庄子与尼采语言观的相关研究现状，并提出庄子与尼采语言观之间为何能够进行比较。正文分为三章，从“至言”与“谎言”提出的原因、内涵以及向审美生存的回归等方面，论述了庄子和尼采对“至言”与“谎言”的产生、使用与态度问题。第一章论述“至言”与“谎言”提出的原因。第一节分析了庄子与尼采所处的特殊时代背景，为“至言”与“谎言”的提出前提。第二节从庄子和尼采的语言观出发，论述了语言的本性问题以及缘何提出“至言”与“谎言”。第二章探讨“至言”与“谎言”的内涵并进行了比较。第一节从“至言”与“小言”、“至言无言”两个方面探讨了“至言”的具体内涵。第二节从尼采批判的三种“谎言”以及尼采推崇的“无辜的谎言”从正反两面探究了尼采“谎言”的具体内涵。第三节则是将“至言”与“谎言”进行对比，找出二者之间的异同点。第三章阐述庄子和尼采如何超越“至言”与“谎言”。第一节论述他们从“至言”与“谎言”超越到他们理想的语言状态“忘言”与“无”言。第二节阐明庄子和尼采思想的最终指向，他们走出一条回归生存的道路，从而开启审美式的生存境域。第三节分析他们自身如何言说的问题。阐明庄子和尼采思想的最终指向，他们走出一条回归生存的道路，从而开启审美式的生存境域。结语则指出本文的研究是为了解决什么样的问题，以及给予我们的启示意义。
[Abstract]:This paper is a comparative study of Zhuangzi and Nietzsche's "Zhi Yan" and "lie", the full text is divided into three parts: preface, text and conclusion.The preface discusses the current situation of the research on Zhuangzi's and Nietzsche's linguistic views, and puts forward why Zhuangzi's and Nietzsche's linguistic views can be compared.The text is divided into three chapters. From the reasons, connotation and return to aesthetic existence, this paper discusses the emergence, use and attitude of "Zhi Yan" and "lie" by Zhuangzi and Nietzsche.The first chapter discusses the reasons of "Zhi Yan" and "lie".The first section analyzes the special background of Zhuangzi and Nietzsche, which is the premise of "Zhi Yan" and "lie".The second section discusses the nature of language from Zhuang Zi and Nietzsche's view of language and why they put forward "Zhi Yan" and "lie".Chapter two discusses and compares the connotation of "Zhi Yan" and "lie".The first section discusses the concrete connotation of Zhiyan from two aspects: "Zhiyan", "small speech" and "Zhiyan Silence".The second section probes into the concrete connotation of Nietzsche's lie from the three kinds of lie that Nietzsche criticized and the innocent lie advocated by Nietzsche.The third section is the comparison between Zhi Yan and lie to find out the similarities and differences between them.Chapter three explains how Zhuangzi and Nietzsche transcend Zhiyan and lie.The first section discusses their transcendence from "Zhi Yan" and "lie" to their ideal language state "forget words" and "nothing" words.The second section clarifies the ultimate direction of Zhuangzi and Nietzsche's thought, and they walk out a way to return to existence, thus opening up the realm of aesthetic existence.The third section analyzes the question of how they speak.To clarify the ultimate direction of Chuang Tzu and Nietzsche's thought, they set out a way to return to existence, thus opening the realm of aesthetic existence.The conclusion points out that the purpose of this study is to solve the problems and give us enlightenment.
【学位授予单位】：聊城大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B223.5;B516.47

【参考文献】