维特根斯坦语言游戏说视域下的蓄意歧义研究

发布时间：2018-04-14 14:21

本文选题：蓄意歧义 + 维特根斯坦　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：蓄意歧义作为人们交际过程中普遍存在的一种语言现象,一直都深受研究者们的关注,但是大多数人都是从语言层面上静态地研究蓄意歧义,很少有人从语言哲学的角度动态地研究蓄意歧义。而蓄意歧义作为一种交际策略总是与哲学之间存在着千丝万缕的联系,因此,本文尝试以维特根斯坦语言游戏说为理论基础来研究蓄意歧义,融合多重视域在过程中把握多种因素对蓄意歧义的影响。首先,本文介绍了维特根斯坦语言游戏说的基本理论框架,为之后章节进行铺垫,其次,总结了蓄意歧义产生的主要原因:语言、语境、说话者和听话者,这些原因让我们在维特根斯坦语言游戏说理论指导下,更加深入地理解蓄意歧义;再次,从生活世界和语言的使用两方面来探讨蓄意与维特根斯坦语言游戏说的联系。最后,从语言、人和语境的维度分析蓄意歧义与维特根斯坦的语言游戏。通过本文的研究,旨在从维特根斯坦语言游戏说理论出发,为蓄意歧义提供一个新的哲学研究视角。
[Abstract]:Intentional ambiguity, as a common linguistic phenomenon in the process of communication, has always been concerned by researchers, but most people study intentional ambiguity statically from the linguistic level.Few people study deliberate ambiguity dynamically from the perspective of linguistic philosophy.As a communicative strategy, intentional ambiguity is always inextricably related to philosophy. Therefore, this paper attempts to study intentional ambiguity on the theoretical basis of Wittgenstein's language game theory.Fusion of multiple horizons in the process of grasping a variety of factors on intentional ambiguity.Firstly, this paper introduces the basic theoretical framework of Wittgenstein's language game theory, which lays the groundwork for the later chapters. Secondly, it summarizes the main causes of intentional ambiguity: language, context, speaker and hearer.Under the guidance of Wittgenstein's language game theory, we can understand intentional ambiguity more deeply. Thirdly, we discuss the relationship between intentional and Wittgenstein's language game theory from two aspects: the world of life and the use of language.Finally, the paper analyzes intentional ambiguity and Wittgenstein's language game from the perspectives of language, human and context.The purpose of this paper is to provide a new philosophical perspective for intentional ambiguity from the perspective of Wittgenstein's theory of language game theory.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：B561.59

【相似文献】