马克思人的发展三形态思想的两种表述——理解马克思前后期思想关系的重要线索

发布时间：2018-04-23 00:37

本文选题：人的发展三形态 + 异化　；参考：《长白学刊》2017年05期

【摘要】：马克思人的发展三形态思想具有两种基本的表述形式:一是1843年《〈黑格尔法哲学批判〉导言》中的表述形式,即"人在神圣形象中的自我异化""人在非神圣形象中的自我异化""人的自我异化的扬弃";二是《1857-1858年经济学手稿》中的表述形式,即"人对人的依赖关系""以物的依赖性为基础的人的独立性""人的自由个性"。理论界以往的研究当中存在着忽视前一种表述、进而忽视前后两种表述之间微妙关系的普遍倾向,需要我们予以检讨。实际上,这两种表述形式之间既有世界观发展程度、批判对象选取、革命着力点等方面的明显差异,又有"价值—科学"维度相统一、思想发展连贯性、社会有机体认知等方面的本质联系,从而为我们提供了一条理解马克思前后期思想关系的重要线索。
[Abstract]:Marx's three forms of human development have two basic forms of expression: one is the form of expression in the introduction to the critique of Hegel's philosophy of Law in 1843. That is, "the self-alienation of man in the sacred image", "the self-alienation of man in the non-sacred image", "the sublation of human self-alienation", the second is the form of expression in < 1857-1858 Economic manuscripts, That is, the dependence of man on man, the independence of man on the basis of material dependence, and the free personality of man. There is a general tendency to ignore the former statement and then ignore the subtle relationship between the two expressions in previous theoretical studies, so we need to review it. In fact, there are obvious differences in the development of the world outlook, the selection of critical objects, the point of focus of revolution, and the unity of "value-science" dimension between the two forms of expression, and the continuity of ideological development. The essential connection between social organism cognition and other aspects provides us with an important clue to understand the relationship between Marx's thoughts before and after his life.
【作者单位】：南京大学哲学系;空军航空大学党的创新理论学习研究中心;
【基金】：吉林省高等教育学会2017年度高教科研一般课题“实战化训练背景下军校政治理论课研讨式教学研究”(JGJX2017D99)阶段性成果
【分类号】：B038

【相似文献】