儒家勇论与血性人格

发布时间：2018-04-24 11:58

  本文选题：儒家 + 勇论　； 参考：《理论学刊》2017年04期

【摘要】：儒家大致从不惧、敢为和中道三个方面对勇的涵义作了深刻阐释,同时基于伦理主义的思维定势,认识到勇并不纯粹是善德,它必须借助于其他伦理范畴加以规定,这就是勇必须有仁、有义,必须合礼、好学和知耻。先秦儒家虽没有提出"勇德"和"勇气"的概念,却在思想体系中阐述了"勇德"、"勇气"和"勇力"。儒家还对勇作了明确的等级和类型区分,提出了小人之勇与君子之勇、野蛮之勇与义理之勇,大勇与小勇,狗彘之勇、贾盗之勇、小人之勇和士君子之勇等类型。当今中国急需深入挖掘和弘扬以儒家勇论为代表的中国传统勇德思想文化资源,以作为培养国人血性人格的精神滋养。
[Abstract]:The Confucianists have never been afraid, and they have made a profound interpretation of the meaning of courage in the three aspects of the middle road and the middle road. At the same time, based on the thought setting of the ethics, it is realized that bravery is not pure virtue. It must be stipulated in other ethical categories. This is that courage must have benevolence, righteousness, must be polite, good learning and shame. The Confucianism of the pre Qin period has not put forward "courage". The concept of "Virtue" and "courage", but in the ideological system, expounded the "courage", "courage" and "courage". The Confucianism also made a clear distinction between the rank and the type of courage, and put forward the style of the bravery and courage of the small man, the bravery and the bravery of barbarism, the bravery of the dog, the bravery of the dog, the courage of the thief, the bravery of the small man and the courage of the gentleman. We need to further explore and carry forward the traditional Chinese culture of courage and morality, represented by Confucian courage theory, as a spiritual nourishment for cultivating the bloody personality of Chinese people.

【作者单位】： 山东社会科学院文化研究所;
【基金】：山东省齐鲁优秀传统文化传承创新重点项目“中华传统文化与社会主义核心价值观研究”(项目编号:15AZD12)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B222
，

本文编号：1796527