从象征性交换到简化交换论——嵌入分析引申出的产权逻辑

发布时间：2018-04-25 07:28

本文选题：象征性交换 + 简化交换论　；参考：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：科斯的相对主义产权理念引出了模糊产权是否受社会限制的问题,而在莫斯的研究领域里,私人和公共财产的模糊性并不意味着一种纠纷。这表明产权交易只是社会交换的一种特殊形式。莫斯将传统的交换界定为整体性社会事实,布西亚的象征性交换及拟像的理论实际是将社会事实的内涵和整体性的维度加以区分和发扬。布迪厄的象征性资本理论看似是对莫斯的质疑,而实际上是解释了象征性交换向拟像过渡的逻辑。简化交换论也未能否定象征性交换的形式,反而从宏观与微观交错的视角解释了功利性进入象征层面,也即私人产权观合法化的过程。
[Abstract]:Coase's idea of relativism leads to the question of whether the fuzzy property right is restricted by society, but in the field of Moss' research, the fuzziness of private and public property does not mean a dispute. This indicates that property right transaction is only a special form of social exchange. Moss defined the traditional exchange as a holistic social fact, and Buthia's theory of symbolic exchange and hypothesized was to distinguish and carry forward the connotation and integrity of social facts. Bourdieu's theory of symbolic capital seems to question Moss, but it actually explains the logic of the transition from symbolic exchange to simulacra. The simplified exchange theory does not negate the form of symbolic exchange, on the contrary, it explains the process of legalizing the view of private property right from the perspective of macro and micro staggered.
【作者单位】：吉林大学哲学社会学院;吉林建筑大学经管学院;
【基金】：吉林大学基本科研业务费(2014ZZ020)
【分类号】：F014.1

【相似文献】