罗振玉与清代学术史研究——以《本朝学术源流概略》为核心的探讨

发布时间：2018-04-25 20:40

本文选题：罗振玉 + 清代学术史　；参考：《社会科学辑刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：罗振玉的学术成就,集中体现了近代中国文史学者的研究特色,即一方面继承和拓展了中国固有的经史之学,另一方面运用西学新知,使之与中国学问相交汇,从而令文史之学在当时获得了极大发展。清代学术为其奠定了学术基础,构成了其学术底色,其诸多学术成就都是从清学中生长出来的。《本朝学术源流概略》先从追溯清之前的历代学术变迁入手,对先秦至明代的历朝学术予以简单评述,以此作为讨论清代学术的前提和基础。接着对有清一代的整体学术面貌,从学术渊源、学术流派、研究方法、学术得失等四个方面进行叙述和评价。对于清代的学术成绩,《本朝学术源流概略》按经、史、子、集四部顺序介绍,且《本朝学术源流概略》铺叙多而论述少,目录学色彩浓厚。从他的整体叙述和对清人治学方法、学术得失的评价中,能够看出其倾向性:一是倡汉宋兼采之学;二是推崇经史考订;三是反感空谈微言大义,不满疑古之学;四是重金石之学。
[Abstract]:Luo Zhenyu's academic achievements concentrated on the research characteristics of modern Chinese scholars of literature and history, that is, on the one hand, he inherited and expanded the inherent study of Chinese classics and history, on the other hand, he used new knowledge of western learning to make it intersect with Chinese learning. Thus, the study of literature and history was greatly developed at that time. The academic foundation of the Qing Dynasty was laid, and its academic background was formed. Many of its academic achievements were derived from the studies of the Qing Dynasty. [the outline of the academic Origin of this Dynasty] begins with the academic changes of the past dynasties before the Qing Dynasty. This paper makes a brief comment on the academic history of the pre-Qin and Ming dynasties, which is the premise and foundation of the academic discussion of the Qing Dynasty. Then the whole academic outlook of Qing Dynasty is described and evaluated from four aspects: academic origin, academic schools, research methods and academic gains and losses. For the academic achievements of the Qing Dynasty, the outline of the academic Origin of this Dynasty was introduced according to the four parts of the classics, history, children and collections, and the outline of the academic sources of the Qing Dynasty was described more and less, with a strong color of bibliography. From his overall narration and evaluation of the academic gains and losses of the Qing Dynasty, it can be seen that his tendency is: first, advocating the study of Han and Song dynasties, second, canoning the history of the classics, third, resenting empty words, dissatisfied with the theory of ancient times; Fourth, the study of heavy stone.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：B249-5

【相似文献】