海德格尔、施特劳斯与柏拉图的洞穴隐喻

发布时间：2018-04-30 12:10

本文选题：柏拉图 + 海德格尔　；参考：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2017年05期

【摘要】：柏拉图的洞穴隐喻提供了哲学问题的基本情景:它既包含纯粹哲学的思之擢升,亦包含实践/政治哲学的在世共处。海德格尔的洞喻解读意图道说柏拉图未曾言明的无蔽之真,这种赫拉克利特式含藏解蔽的斗争面相在对洞穴火堆的神庙疏解中得到彰显。施特劳斯的洞喻解读对纯粹哲学的存在之思保持了沉默,却对折返洞穴的苏格拉底式处境(城—哲冲突)进行了鞭辟入里的发微。总体来看,海氏和施氏代表了后尼采时代回返古希腊的两种不同路向:一方试图开启纯粹哲学重新开始的可能性,另一方试图直面哲学与诗之争的原初政治经验,尽管这两方面并未出离柏拉图的洞穴隐喻之外。海德格尔对太阳(善之相)的无视与施特劳斯对存在(西学之"体")问题的沉默,使得一方堕入虚无主义(形式主义)的深渊,另一方陷入主义之争的泥潭。因此,重新回到古希腊,在柏拉图洞穴隐喻的处境下拷问两位哲人的致思努力和各自偏废,对我们理解柏氏思想的丰富意涵和执两用中,恰切评估海氏、施氏哲学思考的整体脉象、眼界高下及其理论得失,具有拨云见日的解蔽意义。
[Abstract]:Plato's cave metaphor provides a basic scenario for philosophical problems: it includes both the promotion of pure philosophy and the living coexistence of practical / political philosophy. Heidegger's cave metaphor interprets the intention that Plato has not stated the truth of the hidden, this Heraclitus style of the struggle to hide the face of the cave fire in the temple of the dredging. Strauss' interpretation of the cave metaphor is silent on the thought of pure philosophy, but it makes the Socrates situation (the city-philosophy conflict) come back to the cave. In general, Hayes and Shi represent two different ways of returning to ancient Greece in the post-Nietzsche era: one side tries to open up the possibility of a new beginning of pure philosophy, and the other tries to face up to the original political experience of the struggle between philosophy and poetry. Although these two aspects are not beyond Plato's cave metaphor. Heidegger's disregard for the sun and Strauss' silence on the question of being (the "body" of western learning) make one side fall into the abyss of nihilism (formalism) and the other side fall into the quagmire of controversy of doctrine. Therefore, returning to ancient Greece and torturing the two philosophers in Plato's cave metaphorical situation, the efforts of the two philosophers and their respective deviations have been neglected. In our understanding of the rich meaning and enforcement of Burke's thought, it is appropriate to assess Hayes. The whole pulse of Shih's philosophical thinking, and the gain and loss of his theory, are of great significance.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学哲学系;复旦大学哲学学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学青年基金项目(13CZX061) 第59批中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2016M591610)
【分类号】：B08

【相似文献】