洛克的“人类需求”与“劳动占有”

发布时间：2018-05-12 02:00

  本文选题：财产 + 财产权　； 参考：《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：洛克将私有财产权视为一种自然权利,这种财产权的本质在于没有经过所有者的同意,其他人或者政府就无权侵犯个人的财产。为了对私有财产及其权利之自然性进行证明,洛克从四个神学前提——原初的共有财产、平等的权利、根本的自然法和劳动——出发,从人类需求的满足和劳动占有理论两条路径进行论证,而劳动占有理论的推进又包含自我所有权和混合论证两个部分。洛克的这些论证在很大程度上确立了私有财产及其权利的自然性,同时也受到诸多学者的质疑和批判。
[Abstract]:Locke regards private property rights as a natural right. The essence of this property right is that no other person or government has the right to violate personal property without the consent of the owner. In order to prove the naturality of private property and its rights, Locke proceeded from four theological premises-the original common property, equal rights, fundamental natural law and labor- The theory of labor possession consists of two parts: self-ownership and mixed argument. To a great extent, Locke's argument established the naturalness of private property and its rights, and was questioned and criticized by many scholars.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学哲学院;
【分类号】：B561.24
，

本文编号：1876599