成德之教:牟宗三批评朱熹的理据和目的

发布时间：2018-05-16 22:32

  本文选题：成德之教 + 牟宗三　； 参考：《江淮论坛》2017年04期

【摘要】：牟宗三关于朱熹理学思想的批评,有着自己的理由和根据。这样的理由和根据,根源于牟宗三对于儒学思想的发展历史的与众不同的解读和关于儒学思想的本质的与众不同的理解和诠释。由于牟宗三把儒学思想的本质理解和诠释为是为人的自觉自律的道德实践提供理论根据和思想支持,因此,从人的本性中揭示道德价值的来源和从人的本心即原初意识中发现道德意识,也就成为宋明新儒学继承和发展儒学思想的理论课题和历史使命。在他看来,朱熹的理学思想偏离了这一理论课题和历史使命,因此不是继承和发展儒学思想的正宗主流。牟宗三关于朱熹理学思想的批评,重新思考和探索了儒学思想的发展历史和儒学思想的本质问题,对于反省和反思全球化语境中的儒学思想存在和发展的可能性和现实性不无启迪和借鉴的价值和意义。
[Abstract]:Mou Zongsan's criticism of Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism has its own reasons and bases. The reasons and bases are rooted in Mou Zongsan's unique interpretation of the history of Confucianism and his distinctive understanding and interpretation of the essence of Confucianism. Since Mou Zongsan interpreted the essence of Confucianism as providing theoretical basis and ideological support for the moral practice of self-discipline, To reveal the source of moral value from human nature and to discover moral consciousness from the original consciousness became the theoretical subject and historical mission for the Neo-Confucianism in Song and Ming dynasties to inherit and develop Confucianism. In his opinion, Zhu Xi's thought of Neo-Confucianism deviates from this theoretical subject and historical mission, so it is not the mainstream of inheriting and developing Confucianism. Mou Zongsan's criticism of Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism reconsiders and explores the development history of Confucianism and the essence of Confucianism. To reflect on and reflect on the possibility and reality of the existence and development of Confucianism in the context of globalization, it is not without the value and significance of inspiration and reference.
，

本文编号：1898716