科学的系统,还是人文的系统,这是个问题——与叶隽商榷

发布时间：2018-05-16 20:01

本文选题：科学 + 人文　；参考：《上海文化》2017年06期

【摘要】：侨易学是一次系统建构实验,体现了当代社会观察和简化自身复杂性的愿望。叶隽利用《易经》的符号路径,发展了"二元三维"的侨易系统,给极度复杂的社会运作和演变一个简明框架。然而,这种建构系统思路的缺陷在于,它以形而上的"道"为归依,和形而下世界缺乏有效沟通,对于"中"的指定沦为修辞性的补救措施,这就导致:一是和物质世界相脱离;二是不能意识到自身也只是社会系统的产物。相反,本文作者主张,系统的组织原则须由"人文"变为"科学",因为一是科学才是和现实世界的变化相融共生的现代理性形式;二是科学才能打破超系统的幻想——一切科学知识都是临时的。
[Abstract]:The Yi study of overseas Chinese is a systematic construction experiment, which embodies the desire of the contemporary society to observe and simplify its own complexity. Using the symbolic path of the Book of changes, Ye Jun developed the "dual three-dimensional" overseas Chinese system, giving an extremely complex social operation and evolution a concise framework. However, the defect of this kind of systematic thinking is that it takes the metaphysical "Tao" as its reference, lacks effective communication with the metaphysical world, and reduces the designation of "middle" to a rhetorical remedy. This leads to: first, separation from the physical world; second, the inability to realize that itself is only a product of the social system. On the contrary, the author argues that the organizational principle of the system should be changed from "humanities" to "science", because, first, science is the modern rational form of coexistence with the changes in the real world; Second, science can break the illusion of supersystem-all scientific knowledge is temporary.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：B221

【相似文献】