马克思“异化劳动”理论的哲学立场辨析

发布时间：2018-05-29 23:04

本文选题：异化劳动 + 费尔巴哈　；参考：《江西社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：自《1844年经济学哲学手稿》(以下简称《手稿》)1932年首次全文刊发以来,对异化劳动理论的立场及其基本性质的不同理解引发了国内外广泛而持久的争论。国内外学者大多认为,马克思的异化劳动理论不过是费尔巴哈抽象的人本学逻辑的再现,仍然立足于费尔巴哈的人本学唯物主义立场。但笔者认为,马克思虽然在《手稿》中借用了费尔巴哈的术语,但只要严格遵循异化劳动的文本逻辑,准确把握异化劳动的理论内涵,就会发现,马克思异化劳动理论的关注点、出发点、核心精粹、理论结论、提出任务、遗留问题以及遗留问题的解决等,都不仅鲜明地呈现出与费尔巴哈的本质性差异,而且可以把《手稿》及其异化劳动理论看作马克思唯物史观的理论发源地。
[Abstract]:Since the first text of the 1932 economic and Philosophical Manuscript of <1844 (hereinafter referred to as < manuscript >) for the first time, the different understanding of the standpoint and basic nature of the alienated labor theory has led to a wide and lasting debate both at home and abroad. Most scholars at home and abroad believe that Marx's theory of alienated labor is only the logic of Feuerbach's abstract humanism. The reappearance is still based on the materialist standpoint of Feuerbach's humanism, but the author thinks that although Marx borrowed Feuerbach's term in the manuscript, but if he strictly follows the text logic of alienated labor and accurately grasps the theoretical connotation of alienated labor, it will find the focus, starting point, and core of Marx's alienated labor theory. The essence, the theoretical conclusion, the task, the remaining problems and the solution of the remaining problems are not only clearly showing the essential difference from Feuerbach, but also the theory of "manuscript >" and his alienated labor theory as the birthplace of Marx's historical materialism.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学人文学院;徐州工程学院马克思主义学院;
【基金】：江苏高校哲学社会科学基金资助项目“《1844年经济学哲学手稿》再评价”(2016SJD710018) 上海财经大学研究生创新基金项目“《1844年经济学哲学手稿》再评价”
【分类号】：B0-0

【参考文献】