黄宗羲对阳明心学的定位

发布时间：2018-06-09 01:55

本文选题：黄宗羲 + 阳明心学　；参考：《现代哲学》2017年05期

【摘要】：黄宗羲作为王门后学的一名得力干将,同时也是与王夫之、顾炎武齐名的明末清初三大思想家之一。他集"王门后学"与"明末启蒙思想家"的身份于一身,对明代阳明心学有着特殊的情感和定位,这一定位即"立心学为圣学"。在尊崇与维护阳明心学的基础上,黄宗羲不仅对阳明心学和释老之学做了区分,而且还努力为"王门四句教"辩难,试图从"心即理"的命题出发,划分儒释之界限;也试图通过重新理解"四句教"的涵义、置疑"四句教"的出处,以剔除"四句教"对阳明心学的负面影响。黄宗羲对阳明心学的定位,不仅充分显示出其本人的学术好尚,同时也反映出其作为一名学术史家在一定程度上对明代学术领域中阳明心学、程朱理学和释氏之学的论断和评价。
[Abstract]:As a powerful GanJiang, Huang Zongxi is one of the three thinkers in the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty with the same reputation as Wang Fuzhi and Gu Yanwu. He combines the identity of "Wang Men Houxue" and "the Enlightenment thinker" in the late Ming Dynasty, and he has a special emotion and orientation to the Yangming Heart study in the Ming Dynasty, that is, "setting the mind study as the sacred study". On the basis of respecting and maintaining Yangming's study of mind, Huang Zongxi not only distinguishes the study of Yangming's mind from the study of Buddhism, but also tries to distinguish between "Wang Men's four sentences' teaching" and tries to divide the boundaries of Confucianism and Buddhism from the proposition of "mind is reason". It also tries to reunderstand the meaning of "four sentences" and question the origin of "four sentences" in order to eliminate the negative influence of "four sentences" on Yangming's learning. Huang Zongxi's position on Yangming's psychology not only fully shows his academic excellence, but also reflects that he, as an academic historian, to a certain extent, studied Yangmingxin in the academic field of Ming Dynasty. The thesis and evaluation of Cheng Zhu's Neo-Confucianism and Shi's study.
【作者单位】：黑龙江省社会科学院《学习与探索》杂志社;
【基金】：黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划专项项目“以《明儒学案》为中心的中国哲学视阈下的传统学术史思想研究”(14D062)
【分类号】：B249.3

【相似文献】