重释马克思关于社会存在与意识关系的论断

发布时间：2018-06-15 10:21

  本文选题：社会存在 + 意识　； 参考：《哲学动态》2017年05期

【摘要】：在马克思关于社会存在与意识关系论断的解读上,"决定论"解读过分强化了其科学化和因果必然性的向度,从而把它与个人自由相对立。传统教科书中流行的"决定(作用)和反作用"理解模式,无法摆脱决定论解读的嫌疑。"规定论"解读借助德国观念论传统尤其是黑格尔逻辑学的思想资源,对决定(bestimmen)的意义进行重新界定,以中性化的立场把因果关系转换为条件关系,破除了"决定论"解读中的线性决定关系理解模式,为个人在历史的创造过程中发挥能动性留下了位置。但其对语义和逻辑分析的过分倚重,与马克思的社会批判进路显然存在着较大差距。因此,我们应以强调诸因素间相互作用的"制约论"解读模式去理解。
[Abstract]:In Marx's interpretation of the relationship between social existence and consciousness, the interpretation of "determinism" overintensifies the direction of its scientific and causal inevitability, thus contrasting it with individual freedom. The popular "decision" and "reaction" mode of understanding in traditional textbooks cannot get rid of the suspicion of deterministic interpretation. The prescriptive theory "redefines the meaning of decision bestimmenon with the help of the tradition of German concept theory, especially the ideological resources of Hegel's logic, and converts causality into conditional relationship with a neutral position." Breaking out the understanding model of linear deterministic relationship in the interpretation of determinism, it leaves a place for individuals to play a dynamic role in the process of historical creation. However, its over-reliance on semantic and logical analysis is obviously different from Marx's approach to social criticism. Therefore, we should interpret the theory of restriction by emphasizing the interaction of various factors.
【作者单位】： 深圳大学社会科学学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“马克思主义与当代社会政治哲学发展趋势”(12&ZD106) 深圳大学高水平大学建设“马克思主义理论与思想政治教育专项资助项目”(16MSZX13)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B036
，

本文编号：2021683