负责任地反思负责任创新——技术哲学思路下的RRI

发布时间：2018-06-17 08:17

本文选题：负责任创新 + 技术哲学　；参考：《自然辩证法通讯》2017年06期

【摘要】：负责任创新(Responsible Research and Innovation,简称RRI)是欧盟"地平线2020"战略下科技政策中的重要组成部分。RRI作为一个新兴思路,内容十分丰富,其概念尚在动态发展之中。本文着重从技术哲学的思路下来理解RRI,梳理社会建构技术论(SCOT)和价值敏感性设计(VSD)等相关技术哲学思路的发展脉络,论述了RRI在技术哲学史中的地位和责任观念的内涵。RRI作为一种有传承的技术哲学和管理思路,与SCOT单方面强调社会价值对技术塑造不同,它重视技术同价值的双向互动。技术能够物化和实现价值,价值也能改造技术。同时,相较于VSD,RRI采取了更加民主开放的责任观念,规避了可能的家长制风险。但RRI内嵌的责任观念仍未被充分反思,轻率使用RRI管理模型可能导致价值困惑和价值迁移。
[Abstract]:Responsible Research and innovation (RRI) is an important component of science and technology policy under the "Horizon 2020" strategy of EU. As a new idea, RRI is rich in content and its concept is still developing dynamically. This paper focuses on understanding RRI from the thinking of philosophy of technology, combing the development of relevant philosophy of technology, such as the theory of social constructivism (SCOT) and value sensitivity design (VSD), etc. This paper discusses the meaning of RRI's position and responsibility in the history of technology philosophy. RRI, as a kind of inherited philosophy of technology and management, is different from Scot's unilateral emphasis on social value in shaping technology, it attaches importance to the two-way interaction between technology and value. Technology can materialize and realize value, value can also transform technology. At the same time, VSD RRI adopted a more democratic and open concept of responsibility, avoiding the possible risk of patriarchal system. However, the concept of responsibility embedded in RRI has not been fully reflected, and the reckless use of RRI management model may lead to value confusion and value transfer.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学哲学学院;
【基金】：企业服务数字化隐私问题研究(项目编号:SKHX2017022)
【分类号】：N02

【相似文献】