刘宗周对宋儒“义理之性”概念的批判及对心学的重建

发布时间：2018-06-21 04:07

本文选题：朱子学 + 义理之性　；参考：《云南社会科学》2017年02期

【摘要】：朱子门人后学对于"朱子学"(1)的传承和传播发挥了举足轻重的作用。在此传承和传播的过程当中,门人后学对于朱子相关理论学说多有创造性诠释。陈埴"义理之性"概念的提出和诠释就是一个范例。"义理之性"概念与孟子、程子和朱子心性理论一脉相承,而在理学形而上学化历程上又有所深化。如果说朱子的心性论是二层而一元的,陈埴心性论即是一层而二元的。明代学者立足心学范式,对于朱子学心性论多作整体性否定和批判。其间,刘宗周对于"义理之性"概念的批判最为彻底,也最有代表性。这一批判工作与其对于心学的重建又可谓是一体两面的。
[Abstract]:Zhu Xi's disciples have played an important role in the inheritance and dissemination of "Zhu Zixue" (1). In the process of inheritance and dissemination, the disciples have many creative interpretations of Zhu Xi's theory and theory. In the course of the metaphysics of Neo Confucianism, the theory of sex is deepened. If Zhu Xi's theory of mind is two layers and one yuan, Chen's theory of mind is one layer and two yuan. The scholars of the Ming Dynasty based on the paradigm of the mind and criticized Zhu Zixue's theory of mind as a whole. In the meantime, Liu Zongzhou's concept of "the nature of righteousness" was criticized. The judgment is the most thorough and the most representative. This critique is both one and two sides to the reconstruction of mind.
【作者单位】：南昌大学江右哲学研究中心;
【基金】：2014年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“朱子门人后学研究”(项目号:14ZDB008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B248

【相似文献】