理想人格下的“正”“反”原旨与误用——《老子》“阴谋说”的辩证逻辑溯源

发布时间：2018-06-30 18:06

本文选题：阴谋论 + 辩证法　；参考：《兰州学刊》2017年04期

【摘要】：《老子》不是阴谋之说,但现代学者从辩证法的角度解释《老子》并不能洗脱其与阴谋说的联系,相反却潜在地为阴谋论提供了理论基础。彻底解决问题的关键是真正理解《老子》的理想人格,理解《老子》所包含的"有"、"无"和"正"、"反"两层对立关系。其中,"无"是《老子》无欲无知无德无我的、非社会的理想人格和精神自由,"有"与"无"相对而统摄"正"、"反",辩证法分析只适用于"有"的层次、只适用于处理"正""反"关系。而《老子》的价值追求是"无",是"无"对"有"、对"正""反"辩证循环的消解、抽离和超越。阴谋论和辩证法对《老子》思想的变异在于:它们都忽视了"无"的层面,而只关注"有"的层面;只看到"正""反"的辩证转化,并加以利用,企图在其中树立《老子》的价值目标和行事准则。
[Abstract]:Laozi is not a conspiracy theory, but modern scholars explain it from the angle of dialectics, which can not get rid of its connection with conspiracy theory. On the contrary, it provides a theoretical basis for conspiracy theory. The key to solve the problem is to truly understand the ideal personality of Laozi and to understand the antagonistic relationship between "have", "nothing" and "positive" and "opposition" contained in Laozi. Among them, "nothing" is "Laozi", the ideal personality and spiritual freedom of non-society, "you" and "nothing" are opposite to "positive" and "negative". Dialectical analysis only applies to the level of "being". It only applies to dealing with positive and negative relationships. The value pursuit of Laozi is "nil", "nil" versus "have", "positive" and "anti-" dialectical cycle of digestion, withdrawal and transcendence. The variation of conspiracy theory and dialectics in Laozi's thought lies in: they both ignore the "nothing" level, but only pay attention to the "existence" level; they only see the dialectical transformation of "positive" and "reverse" and make use of them. In the attempt to set the value of the "Laozi" goals and norms of conduct.
【作者单位】：北京大学高等人文研究院;
【分类号】：B223.1

【参考文献】