论新时期中国学界理解马克思主义哲学的三种路向
发布时间：2018-08-13 10:44
【摘要】：在改革开放新时期开放多元的社会和学术环境下,援"西学"入"马",以"西学"来解"马",寻求出"新",成为马克思主义哲学阐释的重要路径。"以西学解马"可以分两种:一种是以西方近代哲学为资源,对马克思主义哲学作一种"启蒙主义"式的解读;一种是以西方现当代哲学为资源,对马克思主义哲学作一种"后现代主义"式的解读。与此同时,中国学界还存在着致力于吸收前两种解释路向的成果、又不断在与它们相抗衡的第三种解释路向。把马克思主义哲学启蒙主义化和后现代主义化的缺陷,不仅在于后者理论本身具有缺陷、不符合马克思主义经典的结论,还在于这些思潮的立脚点在马克思本身的思想发展历程中,实际上都已经被马克思超越了。只有当马克思在其成熟时期完整提出其两大发现,马克思及其理论才显露出完整意义。我们要根据这一"原本"来理解马克思,在此基础上生发出创新成果。
[Abstract]:Under the open and pluralistic social and academic environment in the new period of reform and opening up, it has become an important path for Marxist philosophy to help "western learning" into "horse", to understand "horse" with "western learning" and to seek out "new". " There are two kinds of "understanding horses by western learning": one is "enlightening" interpretation of Marxist philosophy based on modern western philosophy, the other is "enlightening" interpretation of Marxist philosophy, and the other is based on modern and contemporary western philosophy. A kind of "postmodernism" interpretation of Marxist philosophy. At the same time, there is a third way to explain the former two kinds of explanation. The defects of enlightening and postmodernism in Marxist philosophy lie not only in the defects of the latter theory itself, but also in the conclusion of Marxist classics. It also lies in that in the course of Marx's ideological development, these thoughts have actually been transcended by Marx. Only when Marx put forward his two discoveries in his mature period can Marx and his theory reveal their complete significance. We should understand Marx according to this "original", and on this basis give birth to innovative achievements.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学哲学学院;上海财经大学人文学院;中国人民大学哲学学院;上海财经大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：B0-0
本文编号：2180736
[Abstract]:Under the open and pluralistic social and academic environment in the new period of reform and opening up, it has become an important path for Marxist philosophy to help "western learning" into "horse", to understand "horse" with "western learning" and to seek out "new". " There are two kinds of "understanding horses by western learning": one is "enlightening" interpretation of Marxist philosophy based on modern western philosophy, the other is "enlightening" interpretation of Marxist philosophy, and the other is based on modern and contemporary western philosophy. A kind of "postmodernism" interpretation of Marxist philosophy. At the same time, there is a third way to explain the former two kinds of explanation. The defects of enlightening and postmodernism in Marxist philosophy lie not only in the defects of the latter theory itself, but also in the conclusion of Marxist classics. It also lies in that in the course of Marx's ideological development, these thoughts have actually been transcended by Marx. Only when Marx put forward his two discoveries in his mature period can Marx and his theory reveal their complete significance. We should understand Marx according to this "original", and on this basis give birth to innovative achievements.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学哲学学院;上海财经大学人文学院;中国人民大学哲学学院;上海财经大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：B0-0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 杜维明;;探寻“我们”的哲学和现实意义[J];杭州(我们);2011年11期
2 竹内良知,黄玮;大西祝与西田几多郎——试论日本近代哲学的起点[J];哲学研究;1984年10期
3 苏冰;欧洲启蒙思潮的哲学依据——兼及中西启蒙的比较[J];福建论坛(文史哲版);1991年03期
4 张中良;;论明代中期以来的三次启蒙主义思潮[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1991年02期
5 张全之;论鲁迅与梁启超的启蒙主义思想[J];齐鲁学刊;1994年02期
6 阮航;略论法国启蒙主义者对古典主义的批判[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);1994年02期
7 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2180736
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2180736.html
