哲学直觉方法的合理性之争
发布时间：2018-08-16 17:50
【摘要】：诉诸直觉是哲学上最经常使用且最长久的方法。擅长反思的哲学家未能给哲学上诉诸直觉的方法的合法性提供辩护,这不能不说是哲学方法论的一个耻辱。方法论反直觉主义者基于没道明论证、无校正性论证和多样性论证,对哲学直觉方法的合法性提出了质疑。消除哲学方法论的耻辱,捍卫直觉方法的合法性的论证有:类比知觉论证、反无校正性论证、否认直觉有显著多样性的论证、否认直觉多样性重要的论证、否认直觉多样性会导致不可靠性的论证。
[Abstract]:Appealing to intuition is the most frequently used and long-lasting method in philosophy. The failure of philosophers who are good at reflection to justify the legitimacy of philosophical methods of resorting to intuition cannot but be said to be a disgrace to philosophical methodology. Methodological anti-intuitionists have questioned the validity of philosophical intuitionism on the basis of uncorrected argumentation, uncorrected argument and diversity argumentation. To eliminate the stigma of philosophical methodology and to defend the legitimacy of intuitive methods include: analogical perception argument, anti-uncorrected argument, argument denying the remarkable diversity of intuition, and argument denying the importance of intuitionistic diversity. The argument that denying intuitionistic diversity can lead to unreliability.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“基于虚拟现实的实验研究对实验哲学的超越”(项目编号:15ZDB016)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B089
，
本文编号：2186727
[Abstract]:Appealing to intuition is the most frequently used and long-lasting method in philosophy. The failure of philosophers who are good at reflection to justify the legitimacy of philosophical methods of resorting to intuition cannot but be said to be a disgrace to philosophical methodology. Methodological anti-intuitionists have questioned the validity of philosophical intuitionism on the basis of uncorrected argumentation, uncorrected argument and diversity argumentation. To eliminate the stigma of philosophical methodology and to defend the legitimacy of intuitive methods include: analogical perception argument, anti-uncorrected argument, argument denying the remarkable diversity of intuition, and argument denying the importance of intuitionistic diversity. The argument that denying intuitionistic diversity can lead to unreliability.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“基于虚拟现实的实验研究对实验哲学的超越”(项目编号:15ZDB016)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B089
，
本文编号：2186727
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2186727.html
