论朝鲜儒者朴世堂的《新注道德经》
发布时间：2018-08-17 10:53
【摘要】：朴世堂作为韩国朝鲜时期的儒学者,虽以儒教为正统,但对朱熹的老子观有异见。朴世堂以体用一源等儒家思想与观念,注解与理解《老子》的道与名、无与有、道与德等被理学家批判的思想与观念,阐明《老子》以道体名用、无形有理、道无迹德有迹为基,是修身治人之学。由此,可以发现朴世堂倾向于脱朱子学,而想要找出儒道所共有的至善。
[Abstract]:Pak Shih-tang, as a Confucian scholar in Korea and Korea, took Confucianism as orthodox, but disagrees with Zhu Xi's view of Laozi. Park Shitang explains and understands the Tao and the name of Laozi, the Tao and the name, the Tao and the morality, and so on, which are criticized by the Neo-Confucianism, and clarifies that Laozi is used in the name of Taoism, which is invisible and rational. The Tao has no trace, the virtue has the trace as the foundation, is the discipline body governs the person the school. From this, it can be found that Park Shi-tang tends to degrade Zhu Zi, and wants to find out what is common to Confucianism and Taoism.
【作者单位】： 韩国汉阳大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B312
本文编号：2187377
[Abstract]:Pak Shih-tang, as a Confucian scholar in Korea and Korea, took Confucianism as orthodox, but disagrees with Zhu Xi's view of Laozi. Park Shitang explains and understands the Tao and the name of Laozi, the Tao and the name, the Tao and the morality, and so on, which are criticized by the Neo-Confucianism, and clarifies that Laozi is used in the name of Taoism, which is invisible and rational. The Tao has no trace, the virtue has the trace as the foundation, is the discipline body governs the person the school. From this, it can be found that Park Shi-tang tends to degrade Zhu Zi, and wants to find out what is common to Confucianism and Taoism.
【作者单位】： 韩国汉阳大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B312
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 强昱;海东朴世堂的老庄学[J];中国道教;2005年01期
，本文编号：2187377
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2187377.html
