所予批判、概念能力无边界性与概念化活动——当代分析哲学的黑格尔式转向及其批判

发布时间：2018-08-23 10:27

【摘要】：塞拉斯借助黑格尔感性确定性不可能性论证,批判所予是神话,但由于他依据了康德的直观与概念二元思维方式,仍陷所予困境中。为了摆脱困境,麦克道威尔的黑格尔式转向依据概念能力无边界性,使世界被动处在概念能力范围内。这虽摆脱了所予,但却陷于经验论困境,即被判断实在性先验地示例的实在性东西并不是具有概念化感觉内容的知觉经验,而只是当前印象,它不能确证普遍性知识。因此当代分析哲学需要推进黑格尔式转向,依据概念能力的设定性,主动运用逻辑的纯粹理念展示关于当前印象的思维规定的感觉内容。只有如此,当代分析哲学才能摆脱所予神话和经验论困境,使知觉经验确证知识。
[Abstract]:With the help of the argumentation of Hegel's perceptual certainty and impossibility, Silas criticizes is a myth, but because he is based on Kant's intuitionistic and conceptual dual mode of thinking, he is still in a dilemma. In order to get rid of the predicament, McDowell's Hegel turn makes the world passive within the scope of conceptual ability according to the boundless nature of conceptual competence. Although we have got rid of what we have given, we are caught in the dilemma of empiricism, that is, the thing of reality which is judged to be a priori example of reality is not the perceptual experience with the content of conceptualized sensation, but only the present impression, which cannot confirm the universal knowledge. Therefore, contemporary analytical philosophy needs to push forward Hegel's turn, according to the establishment of the concept ability, using logical pure idea to show the feeling content of the thinking regulation about the current impression. Only in this way can contemporary analytical philosophy get rid of the dilemma of mythology and empiricism and make perceptual experience corroborate knowledge.
【作者单位】：浙江工业大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：N031

【相似文献】