现象学解构之背后的预设:存在从属于言语

发布时间：2018-09-07 06:54

【摘要】：胡塞尔构造了一个关于意义和事实之间的关系问题,但是在德里达看来,胡塞尔并未给这个问题提供一个完美的答案,他认为胡塞尔致力于消除意义和事实之间的差异,但这不过是在用减少无限性的办法去消除差异性,是不可能解决二者之间的他异性问题的。在此基础上,德里达提出了对现象学的解构,对于施指而言的符号力量,我们缺乏对其进行现象学的解释,正是其现象学解构的焦点。通过解构,德里达分析了现象学存在的种种遮蔽,特别是集中于胡塞尔《逻辑研究》中提出的“表述”与“指号”原初统一性的遮蔽。德里达现象学解构的背后存在着一个最基础,也是最没有根据的预设:存在从属于言语。这个预设可以一直追溯到柏拉图这个源头,然而,回到柏拉图对逻各斯的描述,这个描述并未涉及现象学的声音,因此,德里达的预设,将仍然处于言语与存在的辩证研究之中。
[Abstract]:Husserl constructed a question about the relationship between meaning and fact, but in Derrida's view, Husserl did not provide a perfect answer to this question, and he thought Husserl was committed to eliminating the difference between meaning and fact. But this is to reduce infinity to eliminate the difference, it is impossible to solve the heterosexual problem between the two. On the basis of this, Derrida puts forward the deconstruction of phenomenology, and the lack of phenomenological explanation for the symbolic power of pointing is the focus of its phenomenological deconstruction. Through deconstruction, Derrida analyzes the various shades of phenomenological existence, especially the concealment of the original unity of "expression" and "finger sign" proposed by Husserl in the logical study. Behind Derrida's phenomenological deconstruction, there is a basic and most unfounded presupposition: existence is subordinate to speech. This presupposition can be traced back to Plato's source, but back to Plato's description of logos, which does not involve the voice of phenomenology, so Derrida's presupposition, Will still be in the dialectical study of speech and existence.
【作者单位】：西雅图大学哲学系;郑州工业应用技术学院思政部;复旦大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B516.52

【相似文献】