女性主义方法论的批判与重构——基于弗雷泽后现代女性主义理论的视域
发布时间：2018-09-07 09:18
【摘要】：20世纪80年代以来,女性主义与后现代主义相遇,围绕着解构主义、基础主义和本质主义等方法论难题而发生了无休止的争论,在两者的争论交锋中,早就有一种走出解构主义的后现代主义女性主义动向。解构主义的策略尽管是必需的,但是随着这一语境的隐退,后现代主义女性主义必须重构它自己的方法论。与斯皮瓦克的"策略本质主义"、巴特勒的"女性主义双重运动"以及康奈尔的"解构主义的女性主义"不同,弗雷泽把德里达和利奥塔的后现代主义思想与女性主义批判理论整合起来,从批判的维度重新审视了后现代主义与女性主义之间的冲突与张力,既吸收解构主义批判中的独特见解,又坚持标志着女性主义批判伦理主张的对抗政治改革,对后现代女性主义方法论进行了多维重构。从这个意义上说,弗雷泽的后现代女性主义方法论具有一定的前瞻性和超越性,对于女性主义朝向更完整和更多元的路线发展做出了重要贡献。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, feminism and postmodernism have met, and there have been endless debates around methodological problems such as deconstruction, fundamentalism and essentialism. There has long been a trend of post-modernist feminism out of deconstruction. Although the strategy of deconstruction is necessary, with the retreat of this context, postmodernism feminism must reconstruct its own methodology. Different from Spivak's "Strategic essentialism", Butler's "Feminist dual Movement" and Cornell's "deconstruction Feminism", Fraser integrates Derrida and Liotta's postmodernism with feminist critical theory and reexamines the conflict and tension between postmodernism and feminism from the perspective of criticism. It not only absorbs the unique views of deconstruction critique, but also insists on the anti-political reform, which marks the ethical proposition of feminist criticism, and reconstructs the methodology of post-modern feminism in a multi-dimensional way. In this sense, Fraser's post-modern feminist methodology is forward-looking and transcendent, and has made an important contribution to the development of feminism towards a more complete and multi-dimensional line.
【作者单位】： 南京大学马克思主义学院;南京大学人文社会科学高级研究院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“弗雷泽女性主义批判理论的逻辑谱系及其现实启示研究”(编号:15BZX017)
【分类号】：B089
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, feminism and postmodernism have met, and there have been endless debates around methodological problems such as deconstruction, fundamentalism and essentialism. There has long been a trend of post-modernist feminism out of deconstruction. Although the strategy of deconstruction is necessary, with the retreat of this context, postmodernism feminism must reconstruct its own methodology. Different from Spivak's "Strategic essentialism", Butler's "Feminist dual Movement" and Cornell's "deconstruction Feminism", Fraser integrates Derrida and Liotta's postmodernism with feminist critical theory and reexamines the conflict and tension between postmodernism and feminism from the perspective of criticism. It not only absorbs the unique views of deconstruction critique, but also insists on the anti-political reform, which marks the ethical proposition of feminist criticism, and reconstructs the methodology of post-modern feminism in a multi-dimensional way. In this sense, Fraser's post-modern feminist methodology is forward-looking and transcendent, and has made an important contribution to the development of feminism towards a more complete and multi-dimensional line.
【作者单位】： 南京大学马克思主义学院;南京大学人文社会科学高级研究院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“弗雷泽女性主义批判理论的逻辑谱系及其现实启示研究”(编号:15BZX017)
【分类号】：B089
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 朱静;;解读后现代女性主义对科学知识的建构[J];重庆理工大学学报(社会科学);2010年06期
2 李霞;后现代女性主义的困境及其可能出路[J];淄博学院学报(社会科学版);2000年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 淮Z，
本文编号：2227837
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2227837.html
