认知后果论的批判与重构
发布时间：2018-09-10 08:56
【摘要】：认知后果论是当代主流的认知规范性理论,主张以真为最终价值,并以此评价一切认知状态及认知过程。然而,它存在一个两难困境:假定任何真信念都具有最终价值,显然不符合现实,因为现实世界中存在许多微不足道的真信念;然而,如果我们对这个前提作出限定而排除这些信念,那么它就不能解释所有真信念,导致理论不完备。为了避免这一两难,笔者提出一种认知自然主义:一方面,认知自然主义通过否定真信念具有最终价值而避免了上述两难,指出真信念的价值取决于人类善,即人类的自然历史事实之描述;另一方面,通过为真提供一种客观的外在价值解释而保留了认知后果论的优点,从而能够合理地解释认知确证与真之间的紧密关系。
[Abstract]:Cognitive consequence theory is the mainstream cognitive normative theory which advocates taking truth as the ultimate value and evaluates all cognitive states and cognitive processes. However, it has a dilemma: assuming that any true belief is of ultimate value is clearly not in line with reality, because there are many insignificant true beliefs in the real world; however, If we limit this premise to exclude these beliefs, then it cannot explain all true beliefs and lead to incomplete theories. In order to avoid this dilemma, the author puts forward a cognitive naturalism: on the one hand, cognitive naturalism avoids the dilemma by denying the ultimate value of true belief, and points out that the value of true belief depends on human good. On the other hand, by providing an objective explanation of external value for truth, the advantages of cognitive consequence theory are retained, so that the close relationship between cognitive corroboration and truth can be reasonably explained.
【作者单位】： 浙江工业大学STS中心;厦门大学知识论与认知科学中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“当代知识论系列研究”子课题“认知价值研究”(14ZDB012)资助
【分类号】：B017
，
本文编号：2233975
[Abstract]:Cognitive consequence theory is the mainstream cognitive normative theory which advocates taking truth as the ultimate value and evaluates all cognitive states and cognitive processes. However, it has a dilemma: assuming that any true belief is of ultimate value is clearly not in line with reality, because there are many insignificant true beliefs in the real world; however, If we limit this premise to exclude these beliefs, then it cannot explain all true beliefs and lead to incomplete theories. In order to avoid this dilemma, the author puts forward a cognitive naturalism: on the one hand, cognitive naturalism avoids the dilemma by denying the ultimate value of true belief, and points out that the value of true belief depends on human good. On the other hand, by providing an objective explanation of external value for truth, the advantages of cognitive consequence theory are retained, so that the close relationship between cognitive corroboration and truth can be reasonably explained.
【作者单位】： 浙江工业大学STS中心;厦门大学知识论与认知科学中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“当代知识论系列研究”子课题“认知价值研究”(14ZDB012)资助
【分类号】：B017
，
本文编号：2233975
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2233975.html
