柏拉图模仿说难题的辨析
发布时间：2018-09-14 11:14
【摘要】：模仿说是柏拉图学说中一个非常重要的概念,并且在不同的篇章中都有相关的论述。这些论述之间的关系是什么,模仿的概念在不同的篇章中有没有什么不同?本文分别对早中期的代表作《国家篇》《巴门尼德篇》《蒂迈欧篇》的模仿说问题进行分析,以模仿说为主线,试图对柏拉图理型论思想有一个比较全面的考察和分析。 本文分为四部分,前三部分分别是对这三篇对话的模仿说进行分析,后一部分是对前三部分模仿说问题思路的梳理。在前三部分中,以《国家篇》的模仿说为引子,简单介绍模仿说。即模仿的对象是“不变的一”——理型,模仿的原因在于理型与具体事物的分离,模仿之所以可能是因为我们的灵魂里预先有理型,只不过我们出生后忘记了,通过灵魂回忆就可以记得。模仿说问题在《巴门尼德篇》里得到认真的讨论,但遭到了诘难,即污秽物问题和“无穷后退问题”,更为严重的是引起了理型的不可知论。在这里,模仿说似乎走到了尽头。在这一点上,国内外学者众说纷纭。本文所要进行的研究是柏拉图自始至终并没有放弃“分离说”,这从他的晚期作品《蒂迈欧篇》重提模仿说便可得知。通过对《蒂迈欧篇》模仿说的考察,本文得出结论,这三篇文献的核心是理型、分离、神(工匠),虽然在不同时期概念有所不同,但其发展却有着一脉相承的关系。
[Abstract]:Imitation theory is a very important concept in Plato's theory, and is discussed in different chapters. What is the relationship between these arguments and is there any difference in the concept of imitation in different chapters? This paper analyzes the imitation theory of the masterpiece of the early and middle period, "the country" and "Bamenides" and "the Timothy". Taking the imitation theory as the main line, this paper attempts to have a more comprehensive investigation and analysis of Plato's theory of rationalism. This paper is divided into four parts, the first three parts are to analyze the imitation theory of the three dialogues, and the second part is to sort out the problems of the first three parts. In the first three parts, with the imitation theory of the country as the introduction, the imitation theory is briefly introduced. That is, the object of imitation is the "unchanging one"-the reason for the imitation is the separation of the rational form from the concrete thing. The reason why imitation is possible is that our soul is preferentially rational, but we have forgotten after we were born. It can be remembered through the memory of the soul. The problem of imitation theory was seriously discussed in Parmenides, but it was heckled, that is, the problem of filth and the problem of infinitely backward. What is more serious is the agnostic theory of theory. Here, the imitation theory seems to have come to an end. On this point, scholars at home and abroad have different opinions. The research to be carried out in this paper is that Plato did not give up the theory of separation from the beginning to the end. Based on the investigation of the imitation theory of Timothy, this paper draws a conclusion that the core of these three articles is the theory of form, separation and deity (artisans). Although the concepts are different in different periods, the development of these three documents is related in one line to the next.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B502.232
本文编号：2242546
[Abstract]:Imitation theory is a very important concept in Plato's theory, and is discussed in different chapters. What is the relationship between these arguments and is there any difference in the concept of imitation in different chapters? This paper analyzes the imitation theory of the masterpiece of the early and middle period, "the country" and "Bamenides" and "the Timothy". Taking the imitation theory as the main line, this paper attempts to have a more comprehensive investigation and analysis of Plato's theory of rationalism. This paper is divided into four parts, the first three parts are to analyze the imitation theory of the three dialogues, and the second part is to sort out the problems of the first three parts. In the first three parts, with the imitation theory of the country as the introduction, the imitation theory is briefly introduced. That is, the object of imitation is the "unchanging one"-the reason for the imitation is the separation of the rational form from the concrete thing. The reason why imitation is possible is that our soul is preferentially rational, but we have forgotten after we were born. It can be remembered through the memory of the soul. The problem of imitation theory was seriously discussed in Parmenides, but it was heckled, that is, the problem of filth and the problem of infinitely backward. What is more serious is the agnostic theory of theory. Here, the imitation theory seems to have come to an end. On this point, scholars at home and abroad have different opinions. The research to be carried out in this paper is that Plato did not give up the theory of separation from the beginning to the end. Based on the investigation of the imitation theory of Timothy, this paper draws a conclusion that the core of these three articles is the theory of form, separation and deity (artisans). Although the concepts are different in different periods, the development of these three documents is related in one line to the next.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B502.232
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 先刚;;柏拉图哲学中的“混合”问题[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年04期
2 谢文郁;;信仰和理性:一种认识论的分析[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期
3 宋继杰;柏拉图《蒂迈欧篇》的“宇宙模型”及其相关的理念论问题[J];社会科学战线;2002年06期
4 谢文郁;;巴门尼德的■στιν:本源论语境中的“它是”[J];云南大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
5 王海琴;;《蒂迈欧篇》宇宙论及其对近代科学的影响[J];自然辩证法研究;2006年07期
6 范志均;;数学与善——柏拉图数学思想新探[J];自然辩证法研究;2010年11期
7 余纪元;论柏拉图的回忆说[J];中国人民大学学报;1988年01期
，本文编号：2242546
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2242546.html
