绝对与事件:齐泽克是一个怎样的黑格尔主义者

发布时间：2018-10-05 08:14

【摘要】：在"总体性哲人"黑格尔的理论体系中,"事件"被认为是一个无法被容纳其中的概念。巴迪欧对黑格尔的疏离,亦恰恰是以《是与事件》这本巨著出版为标识的。而与巴迪欧理论旨向极为接近的当代另一位哲人齐泽克,却恰恰始终坚持高举黑格尔主义旗帜。通过分析巴迪欧与齐泽克在"事件"概念上的契合与对黑格尔阐释的歧异,进而梳理齐泽克对黑格尔式辩证法的独特阐释与见解,并追溯这一阐释在思想史上的可能源头,可见齐泽克确实不是一个传统意义上的黑格尔主义者,因为他几乎激进地拒绝所有传统的"黑格尔肖像"。在齐泽克的激进阐释下,黑格尔不再是"现代极权主义"思想源头抑或那位掌控"绝对"的理念主义者。当巴迪欧把黑格尔放置在"事件哲学"的对立面,齐泽克则通过其独特的解读,使得黑格尔完全成为一位同"事件哲学"相兼容的哲人,甚至是其奠基性的思想源头。
[Abstract]:In Hegel's theory system, "event" is regarded as a concept which can not be accommodated. Badio's alienation of Hegel is also marked by the publication of this monumental book. Zizek, another contemporary philosopher whose aim is very close to Badio's theory, always holds high the banner of Hegel's doctrine. By analyzing the consonance between Badio and Zezek in the concept of "event" and the difference between the interpretation of Hegel and the interpretation of Hegel, this paper combs the unique interpretation and opinion of Hegel dialectics, and traces the possible source of this interpretation in the history of thought. Zizek is not a traditional Hegel because he rejects almost all traditional Hegel portraits. Under Zizek's radical interpretation, Hegel is no longer the source of modern totalitarianism or the idealist who controls absolute. When Badio placed Hegel on the opposite of "philosophy of events", Zizek, through his unique interpretation, made Hegel a philosopher compatible with "philosophy of events" and even its fundamental ideological source.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学政治学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“当代激进左翼政治哲学研究”(项目编号:13CZX059)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B516.35

【相似文献】