论《仁学》中的世界主义——谭嗣同思想的再检讨
发布时间：2018-10-15 19:34
【摘要】：以往对谭嗣同政治思想的解读,主要有民族主义和世界主义两种相反的观点。实际上,谭嗣同的思想中同时包含这两种相互矛盾的倾向,而以后者更为显著。他在《仁学》中建立了一种"以太—仁"的普遍主义理论体系,并以此为基础阐述了世界主义的两个面向:地球"大一统"的政治愿景与个体"普遍成佛"的解脱理想。另一方面,面对严峻的现实危机,他又时时表现出强烈的救亡意识。然而,世界主义与民族主义的固有张力在一定程度上消解了"救中国"的合法性。这显示出世界主义理念在近代中国的不合时宜性,也促使我们思考其在当代世界的意义和可能性。
[Abstract]:In the past, there were two opposite views on Tan Sitong's political thought: nationalism and cosmopolitanism. In fact, Tan Sitong's thought contains these two contradictory tendencies at the same time, especially the latter. In "benevolence", he established a universal theory system of "ether-benevolence", and on this basis expounded the two aspects of cosmopolitanism: the political vision of "unification of the earth" and the ideal of individual "universal enlightenment". On the other hand, in the face of severe crisis, he always showed a strong sense of salvation. However, the inherent tension between cosmopolitanism and nationalism dispels the legitimacy of "saving China" to some extent. This shows the anachronism of cosmopolitanism in modern China and urges us to think about its significance and possibility in the contemporary world.
【作者单位】： 北京大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家留学基金资助
【分类号】：B254
本文编号：2273611
[Abstract]:In the past, there were two opposite views on Tan Sitong's political thought: nationalism and cosmopolitanism. In fact, Tan Sitong's thought contains these two contradictory tendencies at the same time, especially the latter. In "benevolence", he established a universal theory system of "ether-benevolence", and on this basis expounded the two aspects of cosmopolitanism: the political vision of "unification of the earth" and the ideal of individual "universal enlightenment". On the other hand, in the face of severe crisis, he always showed a strong sense of salvation. However, the inherent tension between cosmopolitanism and nationalism dispels the legitimacy of "saving China" to some extent. This shows the anachronism of cosmopolitanism in modern China and urges us to think about its significance and possibility in the contemporary world.
【作者单位】： 北京大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家留学基金资助
【分类号】：B254
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 童世骏;;普遍主义之种种[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年06期
2 种海峰;;人类探寻普遍主义的方法及其启示[J];湖北行政学院学报;2008年04期
3 A.费拉雷;刘文旋;;另一种普遍主义:范例的力量[J];世界哲学;2010年04期
4 高瑞泉;;价值普遍主义的冲动及其限度:以“平等”为例[J];河北学刊;2010年04期
5 俞宣孟;;论普遍主义[J];学术月刊;2008年11期
6 董琼华;;超越普遍主义范式[J];天津市工会管理干部学院学报;2012年04期
7 姚大志;;沃尔策:特殊主义与普遍主义之间[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年03期
8 李元;;普遍主义的思维局限与价值僭越[J];南京政治学院学报;2009年06期
9 刘时工;;重审价值观念的普遍性[J];学术月刊;2010年10期
10 何江新;;西方“是论”的发展历程及其与普遍主义和德性伦理的关系[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 朱莹;想象另一种普遍主义[D];华东师范大学;2012年
，本文编号：2273611
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2273611.html
