芬伯格“技术代码”思想研究
[Abstract]:If the reflection on modernity is an important task for contemporary thinkers to solve the problems of modern society, then the reflection on technology constitutes the core of this task. Technology, especially modern technology, not only makes mankind conquer the external nature, but also creates a rich material world for mankind. Modern people firmly believe that with the development of technology, mankind will go to a bright future. However, the two world wars and the ensuing ecological crisis, known as World War III, have completely shattered people's dreams, and people are beginning to realize that technology not only brings human well-being, but also disaster. Therefore, when the thinkers reflect on the problem of modernity, they can not help but point the criticism at the technology. Andrew Feinberg is one of the most important technical philosophers in modern times. Finberg's criticism of technology extends from the field of technology application to that of technology itself, thus finding the "technical code" in the critique of technology itself, thus revealing the root cause of the technological problems in modern society. The idea of "technical code" undoubtedly provides us with a new way of thinking in addition to the familiar framework of technical criticism. The research on Feinberg's "technical code" is mainly carried out from the following five aspects: first, the proposal of "technical code". This part mainly combs the realistic origin and the theoretical origin of Finberg's thought of "technical code", and then points out the thought process of "technical code". Second, power: general sense of the "technical code." In this part, the author mainly expounds Finberg's definition of "technical code" in a general sense, and then expresses that the essence of "technical code" is a kind of power. Third, hegemony: alienation of Technical Code. This part mainly describes the process of Finberg's revealing "technical code" from power to hegemony in modern society, and at the same time points out the manifestation, harm and root of this hegemony. Fourth, democracy: reconstruction of Technical Code. This part mainly expounds the concrete plan that Finberg carried out in order to make the "technical code" dissimilated in modern society from hegemony to democracy, and thus to reconstruct the "technical code" itself. Fifth, reflection and enlightenment. On the one hand, this part discusses the dilemma of Finberg's reconstruction of "technical code", on the other hand, it also points out that the thought of "technical code" has enlightening significance to the understanding and solution of the technical problems in modern society.
【学位授予单位】:安徽师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B089.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高海青;;时代思潮中的技术批判理论——安德鲁·芬伯格教授访谈录[J];自然辩证法研究;2015年03期
2 安德鲁·芬伯格;胡子健;高海青;;使哲学现实化:马克思、卢卡奇和法兰克福学派[J];国外理论动态;2014年07期
3 安德鲁·芬伯格;邱慧;;“大拒绝”还是“长征”:如何看待互联网?[J];工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程;2014年02期
4 安德鲁·芬伯格;高海青;陈真君;;海德格尔与马尔库塞:论物化与具体哲学[J];国外理论动态;2014年03期
5 吴致远;;有关技术中性论的三个问题[J];自然辩证法通讯;2013年06期
6 高海青;;可选择的技术民主化:在哈贝马斯和芬伯格之间[J];哲学分析;2012年03期
7 高海青;;社会合理性批判的历史逻辑:从物化批判到技术批判[J];自然辩证法研究;2012年03期
8 安德鲁·芬伯格;高海清;;马克思主义与社会合理性的批判:从剩余价值到技术政治[J];哲学分析;2011年04期
9 朱春艳;;费恩伯格对马克思主义“向社会主义过渡”理论的批判与重建[J];当代世界与社会主义;2011年01期
10 朱春艳;陈凡;;技术批判视野下的现代性问题探究——安德鲁·费恩伯格的“可选择的现代性”理论分析[J];科学技术哲学研究;2010年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 孙浔;走向技术民主和文化多元[D];复旦大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张柱荣;芬伯格技术民主化思想探析[D];南京航空航天大学;2011年
,本文编号:2295323
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2295323.html