4E认知:因果性与构成性的判定
发布时间：2018-10-26 13:35
【摘要】：在4E认知当中,由于体化认知、嵌入认知、生成认知和延展认知的内部差异,4E认知通常被区分为两大论题:因果性论题和构成性论题。从纵向来看,无论是因果性论题还是构成性论题都是对笛卡尔内在主义的反叛,其中因果性论题是对其拥有主张的反叛,而构成性论题是对其位置主张的反叛;但从横向来看,因果性论题和构成性论题存在根本性的差异,前者涉及的只是产生认知的原因,而后者则涉及产生认知的最小充分条件,在因果性与构成性的判定问题上,目前基于常识的判定、基于认知本质的判定和可操作性判定都存在一定的理论困难或适用局限,因果性与构成性的判定不仅需要认知标准的更为合理的说明,也需要经得起实践的检验。
[Abstract]:In 4e cognition, due to the internal differences of body cognition, embedded cognition, generative cognition and extended cognition, 4e cognition is usually divided into two main topics: causality and constitution. From the vertical point of view, both the causality and the constitution are revolt against Descartes immanentalism, in which the causality is the rebellion against his claim, and the constitution is the rebellion against his position. But from the horizontal point of view, there are fundamental differences between causality and constitution. The former involves only the causes of cognition, while the latter involves the minimum sufficient conditions for the generation of cognition. At present, the judgment based on common sense, the judgment based on the nature of cognition and the decision of maneuverability have some theoretical difficulties or limitations. The judgment of causality and constitution not only needs the more reasonable explanation of the cognitive standard. It also needs to stand the test of practice.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学哲学学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“延展认知与当代知识论关系研究”(16CZX016)
【分类号】：N02
本文编号：2295882
[Abstract]:In 4e cognition, due to the internal differences of body cognition, embedded cognition, generative cognition and extended cognition, 4e cognition is usually divided into two main topics: causality and constitution. From the vertical point of view, both the causality and the constitution are revolt against Descartes immanentalism, in which the causality is the rebellion against his claim, and the constitution is the rebellion against his position. But from the horizontal point of view, there are fundamental differences between causality and constitution. The former involves only the causes of cognition, while the latter involves the minimum sufficient conditions for the generation of cognition. At present, the judgment based on common sense, the judgment based on the nature of cognition and the decision of maneuverability have some theoretical difficulties or limitations. The judgment of causality and constitution not only needs the more reasonable explanation of the cognitive standard. It also needs to stand the test of practice.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学哲学学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“延展认知与当代知识论关系研究”(16CZX016)
【分类号】：N02
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 邱仁宗;论科学史中内在主义和外在主义之间的张力[J];自然辩证法通讯;1987年01期
，本文编号：2295882
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2295882.html
