论第二国际理论家阐释马克思主义哲学的多重路径——基于对马克思主义与哲学之间关系的不同理解
发布时间：2018-11-10 14:43
【摘要】：基于对马克思主义与哲学之间关系的不同理解,第二国际理论家在阐释马克思主义的过程中出现了多重路径。历史唯物主义阐释路径主张马克思主义没有哲学,作为其本质的历史唯物主义是一种研究方法;新康德主义阐释路径主张用康德学说弥补马克思主义的伦理缺陷和哲学"空场";普列汉诺夫、拉布里奥拉等人则认为马克思主义有自己的哲学,前者主张辩证唯物主义是马克思主义完整世界观的理论表现,而后者则将之解释为实践哲学。不同阐释路径之间既相互区别又有一定联系,构成了马克思主义在这一时期的独特特征并对后来的马克思主义者产生了深远影响。重新审视第二国际理论家阐释马克思主义哲学的多重路径,既有利于我们完整地把握第二国际时期的马克思主义,也有利于我们从源头上重新厘清第二国际之后马克思主义发展的基本脉络。
[Abstract]:Based on the different understanding of the relationship between Marxism and philosophy, the second international theorist appeared multiple paths in the process of explaining Marxism. The interpretation path of historical materialism claims that Marxism has no philosophy, and that historical materialism, as its essence, is a kind of research method. The new Kantian interpretation path advocates to use Kant's theory to make up for the ethical defects of Marxism and the "empty field" of philosophy. Prekhanov and La Briola hold that Marxism has its own philosophy. The former holds that dialectical materialism is the theoretical expression of the complete Marxist worldview, while the latter interprets it as practical philosophy. The different interpretation paths are different from each other and have certain relations, which constitute the unique characteristics of Marxism in this period and have a profound influence on the later Marxists. It is beneficial for us to have a complete grasp of Marxism in the second International period if we re-examine the multi-path of the second international theorist to explain Marxist philosophy. It also helps us to clarify the basic thread of the development of Marxism after the second International.
【作者单位】： 南京大学哲学系;江南大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“第二国际马克思主义哲学重大基础问题研究”(11CZX003);国家社会科学基金项目“第二国际理论家关于资本主义及其发展趋势的比较研究及当代价值”(15BKS066)
【分类号】：B0-0;D14
本文编号：2322748
[Abstract]:Based on the different understanding of the relationship between Marxism and philosophy, the second international theorist appeared multiple paths in the process of explaining Marxism. The interpretation path of historical materialism claims that Marxism has no philosophy, and that historical materialism, as its essence, is a kind of research method. The new Kantian interpretation path advocates to use Kant's theory to make up for the ethical defects of Marxism and the "empty field" of philosophy. Prekhanov and La Briola hold that Marxism has its own philosophy. The former holds that dialectical materialism is the theoretical expression of the complete Marxist worldview, while the latter interprets it as practical philosophy. The different interpretation paths are different from each other and have certain relations, which constitute the unique characteristics of Marxism in this period and have a profound influence on the later Marxists. It is beneficial for us to have a complete grasp of Marxism in the second International period if we re-examine the multi-path of the second international theorist to explain Marxist philosophy. It also helps us to clarify the basic thread of the development of Marxism after the second International.
【作者单位】： 南京大学哲学系;江南大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“第二国际马克思主义哲学重大基础问题研究”(11CZX003);国家社会科学基金项目“第二国际理论家关于资本主义及其发展趋势的比较研究及当代价值”(15BKS066)
【分类号】：B0-0;D14
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈爱萍;许文建;;拉布里奥拉对历史唯物主义的阐释及其理论意义[J];内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
2 高宁;;历史唯物主义的基本问题和分析方法——拉布里奥拉《关于历史唯物主义》的文本解读[J];井冈山大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
3 万惠琴;;拉布里奥拉理解历史唯物主义的条件阐释[J];延边党校学报;2011年05期
4 吴军安;赵竟;;试述拉布里奥拉对经济决定作用的理解[J];时代人物;2008年02期
5 吴军安;;浅议拉布里奥拉的历史影响[J];世纪桥;2010年17期
6 徐军;;拉布里奥拉的马克思主义哲学基本原理思想研究[J];扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年04期
7 卢明;;拉布里奥拉唯物史观形成的思想轨迹[J];辽宁教育学院学报(社会科学版);1991年04期
8 卢明;;拉布里奥拉对历史辩证法的发生学阐发[J];锦州师院学报(哲学社会科学版);1991年04期
9 卢明;拉布里奥拉对意识形态变化规律的系统分析[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1992年05期
10 安东尼奥·拉布里奥拉;徐志坚;万惠琴;;社会主义和哲学(二)[J];常熟理工学院学报;2012年09期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 万惠琴;试论拉布里奥拉对历史唯物主义的理解[D];南京师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2322748
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2322748.html
