论洪谦对逻辑经验主义证实原则的研究
发布时间：2018-12-10 12:07
【摘要】：洪谦作为维也纳学派的正式成员，终身研究、传播维也纳学派的哲学理念，方法和精神，在他一生的哲学活动中，研究主体与研究对象始终具有高度的自我相关性。研究洪谦对维也纳学派的态度具有非常明显的方法论意义。 作为研究主体的洪谦基本上是由研究对象维也纳学派培养或塑造的，这使得洪谦对维也纳学派及其主要代表人物的哲学理念，方法，精神等等非常熟悉。洪谦把维也纳学派的理论核心即经验证实原则的一些基本方面，诸如证实原则的发展演变过程，两类命题的区分，经验证实的程序，逻辑方法，以及作为认识的基础而出现的记录语句，确证概念等等都比较清晰、准确而亲切的呈现在他的读者面前了。因而，在中国，甚至在全球，洪谦的名字始终与维也纳学派联系在一起。 洪谦对维也纳学派的研究基本上是站在维也纳学派的立场上进行的，，对维也纳学派的理论主张，哲学方法，洪谦基本上是认同或接受的。即使在某些具体问题上，洪谦和维也纳学派的具体人物的观点有所不同，但洪谦始终没能在理论上有实质性超越，没有能够用马克思主义的实践标准系统批判经验证实原则。洪谦一生的哲学研究几乎没有越出维也纳学派的范围,这应当说极大限制了他的理论视野和理论创造。可见，洪谦的学术特色，学术成就，学术局限，都应当也可以从研究主体与研究对象的自我相关性的角度获得理解。
[Abstract]:As a full member of the Vienna School, Hong Qian studies and disseminates the philosophy idea, method and spirit of the Vienna School for life. In his philosophical activities throughout his life, the subject and the object of the study always have a high degree of self-correlation. It is of great methodological significance to study Hong Qian's attitude towards the Vienna School. Hong Qian, as the subject of the study, was basically cultivated or shaped by the Vienna School of study, which makes him very familiar with the philosophy, method, spirit and so on of the Vienna School and its main representatives. Hong Qian puts forward some basic aspects of the theory core of the Vienna School, namely, the principle of empirical confirmation, such as the development and evolution of the principle of confirmation, the distinction between the two kinds of propositions, the procedure of empirical verification, and the logical method. It is clear, accurate and affectionate to his readers, as well as the recorded statements, confirmatory concepts, and so on, which appear as the basis of his understanding. Thus, in China, even globally, Hong Qian's name has always been linked to the Vienna School. Hong Qian's research on the Vienna school is basically carried out from the standpoint of the Vienna school, and the theory and philosophical method of the Vienna school are basically accepted or accepted by Hong Qian. Even on some specific issues, Hong Qian and Viennese school concrete person's viewpoint is different, but Hong Qian has not been able to have the substantial surpassing in the theory, has not been able to use the Marxism practice standard system to criticize the principle to prove the principle. Hongqian's philosophical study has hardly crossed the scope of the Vienna School, which should be said to have greatly restricted his theoretical field of vision and theoretical creation. It can be seen that Hong Qian's academic characteristics, academic achievements and academic limitations should also be understood from the perspective of self-correlation between the subject and the object of study.
【学位授予单位】：武汉科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：B085
本文编号：2370540
[Abstract]:As a full member of the Vienna School, Hong Qian studies and disseminates the philosophy idea, method and spirit of the Vienna School for life. In his philosophical activities throughout his life, the subject and the object of the study always have a high degree of self-correlation. It is of great methodological significance to study Hong Qian's attitude towards the Vienna School. Hong Qian, as the subject of the study, was basically cultivated or shaped by the Vienna School of study, which makes him very familiar with the philosophy, method, spirit and so on of the Vienna School and its main representatives. Hong Qian puts forward some basic aspects of the theory core of the Vienna School, namely, the principle of empirical confirmation, such as the development and evolution of the principle of confirmation, the distinction between the two kinds of propositions, the procedure of empirical verification, and the logical method. It is clear, accurate and affectionate to his readers, as well as the recorded statements, confirmatory concepts, and so on, which appear as the basis of his understanding. Thus, in China, even globally, Hong Qian's name has always been linked to the Vienna School. Hong Qian's research on the Vienna school is basically carried out from the standpoint of the Vienna school, and the theory and philosophical method of the Vienna school are basically accepted or accepted by Hong Qian. Even on some specific issues, Hong Qian and Viennese school concrete person's viewpoint is different, but Hong Qian has not been able to have the substantial surpassing in the theory, has not been able to use the Marxism practice standard system to criticize the principle to prove the principle. Hongqian's philosophical study has hardly crossed the scope of the Vienna School, which should be said to have greatly restricted his theoretical field of vision and theoretical creation. It can be seen that Hong Qian's academic characteristics, academic achievements and academic limitations should also be understood from the perspective of self-correlation between the subject and the object of study.
【学位授予单位】：武汉科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：B085
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 张镇寰;;真理的实践确认——理论的检验、实效和进步评价[J];北方论丛;2006年02期
2 李芳莹;郭继海;;试论卡尔纳普的真理标准[J];西南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
3 俞吾金;对马克思哲学与西方哲学关系的再认识[J];天津社会科学;1999年06期
4 朱庆祚;;试论逻辑实证主义的“证实原则”[J];上海社会科学院学术季刊;1988年02期
本文编号：2370540
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2370540.html
