哈贝马斯社会治理思想研究
发布时间：2018-12-19 12:46
【摘要】：治理与社会治理是我们党执政理念的重大创新,也是我国发展社会主义的客观要求。当前,我国正处于全面深化改革的攻坚期,社会转型加快,社会治理面临着新的问题,亟需要创新和完善我国社会治理的理论,推进我国社会治理的实践。哈贝马斯的社会治理思想为我们创新社会治理指明了方向:在践行民主法治的基础上,要加快公共领域、公共精神和公民社会的培育。哈贝马斯的社会治理思想主要有交往理性理论、公共领域结构转型理论和民主法治国思想,对中国社会治理和全球治理仍然重要的理论的意义:为中国社会治理思想创新、制度创新提供理论资源;为中国社会公共领域建设、法治化建设提供理论指导;“世界公民”理论、理性乌托邦和全球治理乌托邦为全球治理提供了新视野。虽然哈贝马斯的社会治理思想在加快社会治理的实践上意义影响深远,但也存在着一定的缺陷:乌托邦的交往资质与社会治理实践存在着差距;公共领域结构转型理论的局限性在实践难度重重;“世界公民”理论被斥责为全球治理的乌托邦。
[Abstract]:Governance and social governance are the important innovation of our Party's ruling concept and the objective requirement of developing socialism in our country. At present, China is in the period of comprehensively deepening the reform, the social transformation is speeding up, the social governance is facing new problems, it is urgent to innovate and perfect the theory of social governance in our country, and promote the practice of social governance in our country. Habermas' social governance thought points out the direction for us to innovate social governance: on the basis of practicing democracy and rule of law, we should speed up the cultivation of public sphere, public spirit and civil society. Habermas' thought of social governance mainly includes the theory of communicative rationality, the theory of the transformation of public domain structure and the thought of democratic rule of law, which is still important to Chinese social governance and global governance. Institutional innovation provides theoretical resources; It provides theoretical guidance for the construction of Chinese social public sphere and the construction of rule of law, while the theory of "world citizen", rational utopia and global governance utopia provide a new vision for global governance. Although Habermas's social governance thought has a profound influence on accelerating the practice of social governance, it also has some defects: there is a gap between Utopian communication qualification and social governance practice; The limitations of the theory of structural transformation of the public sphere are very difficult in practice, and the theory of "World Citizen" is denounced as a utopia of global governance.
【学位授予单位】：湖南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B516.59
本文编号：2386935
[Abstract]:Governance and social governance are the important innovation of our Party's ruling concept and the objective requirement of developing socialism in our country. At present, China is in the period of comprehensively deepening the reform, the social transformation is speeding up, the social governance is facing new problems, it is urgent to innovate and perfect the theory of social governance in our country, and promote the practice of social governance in our country. Habermas' social governance thought points out the direction for us to innovate social governance: on the basis of practicing democracy and rule of law, we should speed up the cultivation of public sphere, public spirit and civil society. Habermas' thought of social governance mainly includes the theory of communicative rationality, the theory of the transformation of public domain structure and the thought of democratic rule of law, which is still important to Chinese social governance and global governance. Institutional innovation provides theoretical resources; It provides theoretical guidance for the construction of Chinese social public sphere and the construction of rule of law, while the theory of "world citizen", rational utopia and global governance utopia provide a new vision for global governance. Although Habermas's social governance thought has a profound influence on accelerating the practice of social governance, it also has some defects: there is a gap between Utopian communication qualification and social governance practice; The limitations of the theory of structural transformation of the public sphere are very difficult in practice, and the theory of "World Citizen" is denounced as a utopia of global governance.
【学位授予单位】：湖南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B516.59
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 齐勇;;两种基础实践观的对勘:劳动与交往之间—马克思与哈贝马斯实践哲学之比较[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年05期
2 刘伟;;先验性与经验性的融合:哈贝马斯交往行为理论的实质[J];理论探索;2016年05期
3 李小虎;;需求视野中公共领域的实质 兼论哈贝马斯的“公共领域”对我国社会治理的意义[J];实事求是;2016年02期
4 宋晓丹;;交往理性规约工具理性:哈贝马斯交往理性理论转型及其中国启示[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年01期
5 王晓升;;论国家治理行动的合法性基础——哈贝马斯商议民主理论的一点启示[J];湖南社会科学;2015年01期
6 李慧凤;;公共治理视域下的社会管理行为优化[J];中国人民大学学报;2014年02期
7 郁建兴;王诗宗;;治理理论的中国适用性[J];哲学研究;2010年11期
8 张康之;程倩;;网络治理理论及其实践[J];新视野;2010年06期
9 俞可平;;中国治理评估框架[J];经济社会体制比较;2008年06期
10 陈辉;;沟通与支配:哈贝马斯合理化理论的张力——兼《交往行动理论》读后[J];新东方;2008年08期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王玉平;全球化视野下的哈贝马斯交往行为理论研究[D];安徽大学;2007年
，本文编号：2386935
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2386935.html
