孟子责善论面临的合理性挑战
发布时间：2018-12-21 07:43
【摘要】：围绕孟子的责善论,后世学者既有辩护、传承、创新和发展,也有批评、责难。作为处理父子这一特殊人际关系的学说,孟子的责善论自古以来引起了长久而又广泛的争议和驳难,面临三种合理性挑战:一是己他关系向度的合理性挑战,孟子说的"古者易子而教"并不像他所担忧的那样一定会造成双方关系恶化;二是血亲伦理向度的合理性挑战,孟子"父子之间不责善"的理念与儒家一贯主张的谏亲理念难以融洽,导致血缘亲情与道德理性难以统一、亲情伦理与社会伦理难以统一;三是孟子的"父子之间不责善"理念因担心直谏、义诤和厉言会损害父子仁爱亲情走向拒绝"父子责善",这与他的仁宅义路观念、与仁义礼智"四德"为人的类特质思想相冲突。
[Abstract]:Around Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness, scholars of later generations have not only defense, inheritance, innovation and development, but also criticism and criticism. As the theory of dealing with the special interpersonal relationship between father and son, Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness has caused a long and widespread controversy and refutation since ancient times, which faces three kinds of reasonable challenges: first, the reasonable challenge of the dimension of self-other relationship. Mencius said that "the ancient man changed and taught" does not necessarily cause the deterioration of bilateral relations as he feared; Second, the rationality challenge of blood kinship ethics, Mencius' idea of "not being responsible for kindness between father and son" and the concept of remonstrating kinship advocated by Confucianism are difficult to get in harmony, which leads to the difficulty of unifying blood kinship and moral rationality, and the unity of kinship ethics and social ethics. Third, Mencius'"responsibility between father and son" concept is worried about direct remonstrance, justice and harsh words will damage the father and son love and kinship toward rejection of "father and son blame good", which is with his benevolence and justice concept. It conflicts with the thought of "four virtues" of benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom as human beings.
【作者单位】： 山东社会科学院文化研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“中西伦理学比较视域中的儒家责任伦理思想研究”(14BZX046)
【分类号】：B222.5
，
本文编号：2388600
[Abstract]:Around Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness, scholars of later generations have not only defense, inheritance, innovation and development, but also criticism and criticism. As the theory of dealing with the special interpersonal relationship between father and son, Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness has caused a long and widespread controversy and refutation since ancient times, which faces three kinds of reasonable challenges: first, the reasonable challenge of the dimension of self-other relationship. Mencius said that "the ancient man changed and taught" does not necessarily cause the deterioration of bilateral relations as he feared; Second, the rationality challenge of blood kinship ethics, Mencius' idea of "not being responsible for kindness between father and son" and the concept of remonstrating kinship advocated by Confucianism are difficult to get in harmony, which leads to the difficulty of unifying blood kinship and moral rationality, and the unity of kinship ethics and social ethics. Third, Mencius'"responsibility between father and son" concept is worried about direct remonstrance, justice and harsh words will damage the father and son love and kinship toward rejection of "father and son blame good", which is with his benevolence and justice concept. It conflicts with the thought of "four virtues" of benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom as human beings.
【作者单位】： 山东社会科学院文化研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“中西伦理学比较视域中的儒家责任伦理思想研究”(14BZX046)
【分类号】：B222.5
，
本文编号：2388600
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2388600.html
