对“创造”观念的实践改造与旧哲学的理论转向
发布时间：2018-12-21 15:26
【摘要】：在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中,马克思对"创造"概念的"实践"改造绝不是"私有财产和共产主义"文本部分中的一个唐突的理论事件,它是该文本部分基于哲学高度的理论逻辑的必然产物。在"创造"概念的"实践"改造与转换中,不仅鲜明地体现出马克思对此前以往的一切社会主张所进行的批判乃是一个发生于哲学高度的批判,而且体现了马克思对其自身"社会"主张的论证也是一个发生于哲学高度的论证,并因而体现出马克思扭转旧哲学的理论路向以及开启全新哲学领域的理论尝试。只有立足于这一理论尝试中所初步体现出的新哲学的理论高度,我们才能破解马克思关于"共产主义"的众多令人费解的理论表述。
[Abstract]:In the manuscript of Economics and philosophy of 1844, Marx's "practice" of the concept of "creation" is by no means an abrupt theoretical event in the text of "Private property and Communism". It is the inevitable product of the theoretical logic based on philosophical height in this text. In the transformation and transformation of "practice" of the concept of "creation", it not only reflects clearly that Marx's criticism of all previous social claims is a criticism that occurred in a philosophical height. Moreover, Marx's argument about his own "society" is also a philosophical argument, which reflects Marx's attempt to reverse the theoretical direction of the old philosophy and to open up a new field of philosophy. Only based on the theoretical height of the new philosophy, which is initially embodied in this theoretical attempt, can we decipher Marx's many puzzling theoretical expressions of "communism".
【作者单位】： 上海财经大学人文学院;
【分类号】：B0-0
本文编号：2389096
[Abstract]:In the manuscript of Economics and philosophy of 1844, Marx's "practice" of the concept of "creation" is by no means an abrupt theoretical event in the text of "Private property and Communism". It is the inevitable product of the theoretical logic based on philosophical height in this text. In the transformation and transformation of "practice" of the concept of "creation", it not only reflects clearly that Marx's criticism of all previous social claims is a criticism that occurred in a philosophical height. Moreover, Marx's argument about his own "society" is also a philosophical argument, which reflects Marx's attempt to reverse the theoretical direction of the old philosophy and to open up a new field of philosophy. Only based on the theoretical height of the new philosophy, which is initially embodied in this theoretical attempt, can we decipher Marx's many puzzling theoretical expressions of "communism".
【作者单位】： 上海财经大学人文学院;
【分类号】：B0-0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韦汉军;哲学领域非诚实现象的思考[J];桂海论丛;1999年03期
2 韦汉军;;哲学领域背叛现象的思考[J];社科与经济信息;2001年07期
3 韦汉军;哲学领域自欺现象的思考[J];广西社会科学;2001年02期
4 И.Н.斯米尔诺夫 ,玉清;人的健康——哲学领域研究的一个问题[J];国外社会科学;1986年01期
5 郭正红;哲学领域需要观念更新[J];理论探索;1996年06期
6 杨祯钦;名词解释[J];国外社会科学;1982年03期
7 韦汉军;哲学领域外表现象的思考[J];广西社会科学;2000年06期
8 朱春先;自由在哲学范畴和社会范畴的发展及意义[J];莱阳农学院学报(社会科学版);2000年04期
9 郦家驹;一部充满开拓精神的哲学著作[J];文史哲;1996年02期
10 龚振黔;;论人的需要在认识和实践活动中的作用[J];贵州教育学院学报(社会科学版);1993年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 中山大学哲学系 钱捷;“是理论决定我们能够观察到的东西”[N];中国社会科学报;2012年
，本文编号：2389096
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2389096.html
