现代修辞学视域下工程决策的研究
发布时间：2018-12-26 17:11
【摘要】：20世纪90年代,工程哲学研究在西方学界掀起热潮,与此同时我国学者也开始走在发展工程哲学的道路上。自李伯聪教授提出“我造物故我在”的工程哲学命题,并以“实在论”为研究的切入点之后,有关工程哲学的一些主要问题得到了比较系统的论述。工程决策研究的现有成果主要是从工程哲学角度和管理学角度进行研究,一方面,管理学视角下的工程决策尚未涉及自我意识决策的环节,另一方面工程哲学视角下的工程决策研究主要是倾向于实在论的阐述,并未对决策过程中的修辞性建构和修辞性交往等因素作出更具体的阐释。本文以工程决策活动为研究对象,通过揭示出以往决策理论的疏漏以及决策科学方法的悖论,表明工程决策活动在存在论意义上本质地具有修辞性。通过对工程决策目标生成的修辞分析、决策者构成的修辞分析以及决策交往中策略运用与博弈行为的修辞分析,表明工程决策不仅本质地具有修辞的因素,而且在决策的建构中与决策交往的策略运用中,体现了修辞的方法论意义。在当代修辞学呈现出与各学科交叉的趋势的研究背景下,在现有的工程哲学研究成果之上,受科学修辞学的研究之启发,对工程决策的修辞本质以及工程决策活动的修辞性方法进行了初步探究,期待以工程决策修辞学初探之砖引出更多工程修辞问题的研究之玉。
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, the research of engineering philosophy started an upsurge in western academic circles, at the same time, Chinese scholars began to walk on the road of developing engineering philosophy. Since Professor Li Bocong put forward the proposition of "I create so I am" and started with "realism", some main problems of engineering philosophy have been systematically discussed. The current research achievements of engineering decision-making are mainly from the point of view of engineering philosophy and management. On the one hand, engineering decision-making from the perspective of management has not yet involved the link of self-conscious decision-making. On the other hand, the study of engineering decision-making from the perspective of engineering philosophy is mainly inclined to the elaboration of realism, and does not give a more specific explanation of the rhetorical construction and rhetorical communication in the decision-making process. This paper takes engineering decision-making activities as the research object, by revealing the omissions of previous decision-making theories and the paradox of decision scientific methods, it shows that engineering decision making activities are essentially rhetorical in the sense of existentialism. Through the rhetorical analysis of the formation of engineering decision goal, the rhetorical analysis of the composition of decision makers, and the rhetorical analysis of strategy application and game behavior in decision-making communication, it is shown that engineering decision has not only rhetorical factors but also essential rhetorical factors. Moreover, it embodies the methodological significance of rhetoric in the construction of decision-making and the use of strategy of decision-making communication. Under the background of contemporary rhetoric showing a trend of intersecting with various disciplines, and on the basis of the existing research results of philosophy of engineering, it is inspired by the research of scientific rhetoric. This paper probes into the rhetorical essence of engineering decision-making and the rhetorical methods of engineering decision making activities, and looks forward to drawing more research on engineering rhetoric problems with the bricks of engineering decision making rhetoric.
【学位授予单位】：西安建筑科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B08
本文编号：2392432
[Abstract]:In the 1990s, the research of engineering philosophy started an upsurge in western academic circles, at the same time, Chinese scholars began to walk on the road of developing engineering philosophy. Since Professor Li Bocong put forward the proposition of "I create so I am" and started with "realism", some main problems of engineering philosophy have been systematically discussed. The current research achievements of engineering decision-making are mainly from the point of view of engineering philosophy and management. On the one hand, engineering decision-making from the perspective of management has not yet involved the link of self-conscious decision-making. On the other hand, the study of engineering decision-making from the perspective of engineering philosophy is mainly inclined to the elaboration of realism, and does not give a more specific explanation of the rhetorical construction and rhetorical communication in the decision-making process. This paper takes engineering decision-making activities as the research object, by revealing the omissions of previous decision-making theories and the paradox of decision scientific methods, it shows that engineering decision making activities are essentially rhetorical in the sense of existentialism. Through the rhetorical analysis of the formation of engineering decision goal, the rhetorical analysis of the composition of decision makers, and the rhetorical analysis of strategy application and game behavior in decision-making communication, it is shown that engineering decision has not only rhetorical factors but also essential rhetorical factors. Moreover, it embodies the methodological significance of rhetoric in the construction of decision-making and the use of strategy of decision-making communication. Under the background of contemporary rhetoric showing a trend of intersecting with various disciplines, and on the basis of the existing research results of philosophy of engineering, it is inspired by the research of scientific rhetoric. This paper probes into the rhetorical essence of engineering decision-making and the rhetorical methods of engineering decision making activities, and looks forward to drawing more research on engineering rhetoric problems with the bricks of engineering decision making rhetoric.
【学位授予单位】：西安建筑科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B08
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王佩琼;;决策失误还是异化?——“三门峡水利枢纽”争议辩证[J];工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程;2016年01期
2 李丹;;工程施工索赔博弈决策研究——以电力工程施工为例[J];国网技术学院学报;2015年05期
3 李红满;王哲;;近十年西方修辞学研究领域的新发展——基于SSCI的文献计量研究[J];当代修辞学;2014年06期
4 闫宏秀;;荷兰学派技术解释的后现代特质[J];自然辩证法研究;2013年12期
5 李迁;盛昭瀚;;大型工程决策的适应性思维及其决策管理模式[J];现代经济探讨;2013年08期
6 刘宝杰;;试论技术哲学的荷兰学派[J];科学技术哲学研究;2012年04期
7 郭贵春;刘伟伟;;博弈论语义学的方法论特征及其意义[J];中国社会科学;2012年02期
8 舒国滢;;西方古代修辞学:辞源、主旨与技术[J];中国政法大学学报;2011年04期
9 顾永杰;;三门峡工程的决策失误及苏联专家的影响[J];自然辩证法研究;2011年05期
10 王彦雨;高璐;;科学与修辞:从二元对立到辩证统一[J];科学技术哲学研究;2010年06期
，本文编号：2392432
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2392432.html
