论哈贝马斯后世俗社会的宗教观
发布时间：2018-12-25 17:17
【摘要】：针对西方社会近些年出现的宗教复兴现象,哈贝马斯提出要在世俗理性的基础上包容宗教,要在后世俗社会和商谈伦理学的基础上,将宗教话语纳入政治公共领域,以释放宗教传统依然具有活力的解放潜能。但批评者却认为他的宗教观及其调和策略不仅将信仰与知识的界限模糊,从而使西方的自我理解面临困难,而且还给信教和世俗公民以不平等的认知负担,彰显出某种现代世俗理性特权。争议的核心在于我们是否应该在政治公共领域背后的文化背景中达成一种公共认知条件。这关系到世俗与神圣、理性与信仰的冲突在新时代的解决。从这些不同立场的批判和争议声音中,我们可以看出宗教问题在当代世界中的复杂性。
[Abstract]:In view of the phenomenon of religious revival in western society in recent years, Habermas proposed that religious discourse should be incorporated into the political public domain on the basis of secular rationality and post-secular society and ethics of negotiation. To release the liberating potential of religious traditions that are still alive. But critics argue that his religious views and his reconciliation strategies not only blur the line between belief and knowledge, thus making it difficult for the West to understand itself, but also places an unequal cognitive burden on religious and secular citizens. Show some kind of modern secular rational privilege. The core of the controversy lies in whether we should reach a public cognitive condition in the cultural background behind the political and public sphere. This is related to the secular and sacred, the conflict between reason and faith in the new era. From the critical and controversial voices of these different positions, we can see the complexity of religious issues in the contemporary world.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院哲学研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院创新工程重大研究项目“当代主要社会思潮的最新动态研究与批判”(2014YCXZD001)
【分类号】：B516.59
本文编号：2391417
[Abstract]:In view of the phenomenon of religious revival in western society in recent years, Habermas proposed that religious discourse should be incorporated into the political public domain on the basis of secular rationality and post-secular society and ethics of negotiation. To release the liberating potential of religious traditions that are still alive. But critics argue that his religious views and his reconciliation strategies not only blur the line between belief and knowledge, thus making it difficult for the West to understand itself, but also places an unequal cognitive burden on religious and secular citizens. Show some kind of modern secular rational privilege. The core of the controversy lies in whether we should reach a public cognitive condition in the cultural background behind the political and public sphere. This is related to the secular and sacred, the conflict between reason and faith in the new era. From the critical and controversial voices of these different positions, we can see the complexity of religious issues in the contemporary world.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院哲学研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院创新工程重大研究项目“当代主要社会思潮的最新动态研究与批判”(2014YCXZD001)
【分类号】：B516.59
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 张持平;吴震;;殷周宗教观的逻辑进程[J];中国社会科学;1985年06期
2 牟钟鉴;试论儒家的宗教观[J];齐鲁学刊;1993年04期
3 钟晓宏;;马克思宗教观的历史唯物主义性质思考[J];学理论;2011年09期
4 蔡宝玺;;深生态意识自然观:一种新的生存规范的启蒙——论托尔斯泰的宗教观与老子的学说[J];社会科学辑刊;2011年04期
5 周良发;潘红;;梁漱溟、冯友兰宗教观比较研究[J];温州大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
6 张晴;;从三教合流到批佛辟道:论张载对儒家宗教观的建构[J];黑龙江史志;2014年12期
7 姜秉正;洪仁s曌诮坦鄣姆荷衤矍阆騕J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1992年04期
8 李山峰;;试析孔子的宗教观——以“天命”与“鬼神”为例[J];学理论;2013年26期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 谭爱武;威廉·詹姆士的实用主义宗教观[D];湘潭大学;2009年
2 杨勇;启蒙时代卢梭的宗教观[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
，本文编号：2391417
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2391417.html
