李隆基《孝经注》研究
发布时间：2019-01-01 16:06
【摘要】：唐玄宗李隆基《孝经注》是“十三经”中唯一一部唐人注和“御注”。自唐以来,被历代学者视为研究《孝经》学的主要文献。本文试图结合政治和经学的双重视角,通过梳理唐以前的《孝经》传本和《孝经注》的成书过程,考察御注与疏文的关系,以文本分析为基础,从而揭示李隆基“帝王注经”背后的政治意图及其“移孝于忠”的基本思路,并重新认识其在《孝经》学史及隋唐经学史上的特殊地位。《孝经》的流传有今、古文之分。今文本有郑玄所撰的《孝经郑注》,古文本有相传为孔安国所著的《古文孝经孔传》。至隋代,本已亡佚的《孔传》又出现于世,刘炫对之加以考定而作《孝经述议》。此书真伪虽有争议,但学术影响巨大,与《郑注》形成分庭抗礼之势。正是《孝经》注本存有分歧和争议,至唐玄宗下令重新质定孔、郑二家,刘知几和司马贞等人展开了激烈的辩论,孔、郑二家的争议并未终结。有鉴于此,李隆基开始了重注《孝经》的准备,这是梁武帝萧衍御注《孝经》这一惯例的延续和再现,李隆基出于政治和学术的双重考虑,确立《郑注》为主、《孔传》为辅的基本立场,并参考诸家学说,历时三年而在开元十年(722年)完成并颁布了《孝经注》,这一注本被称为“开元本”。“开元本”于天宝二年(743年)重修,这是李隆基第二次修订《孝经》注本,并于天宝四年(745年)将《孝经注》刊刻于石,即现存的《石台孝经》。天宝五年(746年)《孝经注》又进行第三次修订并颁行中外。元行冲疏文依据的是“开元本”,元氏谨遵“疏不驳注”原则,主要集中于文物典章的疏解,对于御注义理发挥甚少。李隆基《孝经注》一书的思想,包含着三对较为突出的范畴,分别是“孝行”与“孝道”、“爱”与“敬”、“忠”与“孝”。孝行与孝道乃是郑玄、王肃二学的重要分野,李隆基所着眼的,乃是君父之道在“孝行”上的落实,从而不能不提到“孝行”的教化意义和神圣色彩,因而吸收了以“孝道”为主题的王肃经学,认为“孝行”即“孝道”,二者内涵已无多大分别。爱、敬之义是东晋南朝时期学者热衷议论的话题,隋代延续了南朝“先爱后敬”的思想;至唐代李隆基《孝经注》通行后,则一反刘炫等人的陈说,提出“先敬后爱”的观点。至于忠孝之别,则是汉末以来长久议论的话题,两晋及南朝,学界普遍持有“孝先于忠”这一士族名门的本位立场,李隆基《孝经注》则有意强调忠,且完成了“移孝为忠”的嫁接。研究李隆基《孝经注》,不能不涉及邢f:疏。北宋邢f:以李隆基《孝经注》为底本,本着“遵从为主,略有删减”的原则整理元行冲疏,从而根本维护了李隆基注的权威性。可以这样说,《孝经注》能融合《孔传》、郑注本,成为儒学史上普及最广的经典之一,也与宋代官方的遵从和认可密不可分。
[Abstract]:Tang Xuanzong Li Longji's Notes of filial piety is the only one in the Thirteen Classics. Since the Tang Dynasty, scholars have been regarded as the main literature on the study of the Book of filial piety. This paper, from the perspective of politics and Confucian classics, attempts to investigate the relationship between imperial notes and thinning texts by combing the process of making books from the Book of filial piety and the Notes of the Book of filial piety before the Tang Dynasty, which is based on text analysis. Thus, it reveals the political intention behind Li Longji's "Emperor's Notes" and its basic idea of "shifting filial piety to loyalty", and reunderstands his special position in the history of the study of filial piety and the Sui and Tang dynasties Classics. The spread of the Book of filial piety is divided into ancient and modern. This text has Zheng Xuan's "Xiao Jing Zheng Note", and the ancient text is "the Ancient Book of filial piety" by Kong Anguo. To the Sui Dynasty, the lost "Kong Zhuan" appeared again in the world. Although the authenticity of the book is controversial, but academic impact is enormous, and the "Zheng Note" formed a trend of confrontation. It was in the "Book of filial piety" that there were differences and controversies, until the Tang Xuanzong ordered the re-determination of the Confucius, Zheng Erjia, Liu Zhiji, Sima Zhen and others engaged in a heated debate, and the controversy between Kong and Zheng did not end. In view of this, Li Longji began to prepare for the re-annotation of the Book of filial piety, which is the continuation and reproduction of the convention of Xiao Yan's Note of Xiao Yan of the Liang Dynasty. Li Longji, out of both political and academic considerations, established the "Zheng Note" as the principal. The basic standpoint of "Kong Zhuan", and referring to the various theories, took three years to complete and promulgate the "Book of filial piety" in the ten years of Kaiyuan (722), which was called "Kaiyuan Ben". Kaiyuan Ben was rerevised in the second year of Tianbao (743), which was the second time that Li Longji revised the annotated Book of filial piety, and printed the Book of filial piety in the four years of Tianbao (745) in stone, that is, the extant Shitai Book of filial piety. Tianbao five-year (746) filial piety note was revised for the third time and promulgated at home and abroad. Yuan line Chongshu text is based on "Kaiyuan Ben", Yuan obeys the principle of "not refuting notes", mainly concentrated on the interpretation of cultural relics regulations, and played very little in the righteousness of imperial annotations. Li Longji's thoughts in the Book of filial piety contain three more prominent categories, namely, filial piety and filial piety, love and respect, loyalty and filial piety. Filial piety and filial piety are important distinctions between Zheng Xuan and Wang Su. What Li Longji focuses on is the implementation of the principle of "filial piety", so the enlightenment significance and sacred color of "filial piety" cannot be ignored. Therefore, Wang Su thought that filial piety is filial piety. Love, respect for the meaning of the Eastern Jin and Southern dynasties scholars are keen to discuss the topic, the Sui Dynasty continued the Southern Dynasty "love before respect" thinking; to the Tang Dynasty Li Longji "the Book of filial piety" after the passage, a contrary to Liu Xuan and others Chen said, put forward the "first respect then love" view. As for the distinction of loyalty and filial piety, it has long been a topic of discussion since the end of the Han Dynasty. In the two Jin and Southern dynasties, scholars generally held the standard position of "filial piety before loyalty", and Li Longji's "the Book of filial piety" intended to emphasize loyalty. And complete the grafting of "transfer filial piety into loyalty". The study of Li Longji's the Book of filial piety cannot but involve Xing f: Shu. Xing f of the Northern Song Dynasty: based on Li Longji's Notes on the Book of filial piety, in line with the principle of "obeying the principle of giving priority to, slightly abridging", the Yuan lines were sorted out, thus maintaining the authority of Li Longji's notes. It can be said that "the Book of filial piety" can fuse "Kongzhuan", Zheng annotated Ben, become one of the most popular classics in the history of Confucianism, and also closely related to the official compliance and approval of Song Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B241
本文编号：2397788
[Abstract]:Tang Xuanzong Li Longji's Notes of filial piety is the only one in the Thirteen Classics. Since the Tang Dynasty, scholars have been regarded as the main literature on the study of the Book of filial piety. This paper, from the perspective of politics and Confucian classics, attempts to investigate the relationship between imperial notes and thinning texts by combing the process of making books from the Book of filial piety and the Notes of the Book of filial piety before the Tang Dynasty, which is based on text analysis. Thus, it reveals the political intention behind Li Longji's "Emperor's Notes" and its basic idea of "shifting filial piety to loyalty", and reunderstands his special position in the history of the study of filial piety and the Sui and Tang dynasties Classics. The spread of the Book of filial piety is divided into ancient and modern. This text has Zheng Xuan's "Xiao Jing Zheng Note", and the ancient text is "the Ancient Book of filial piety" by Kong Anguo. To the Sui Dynasty, the lost "Kong Zhuan" appeared again in the world. Although the authenticity of the book is controversial, but academic impact is enormous, and the "Zheng Note" formed a trend of confrontation. It was in the "Book of filial piety" that there were differences and controversies, until the Tang Xuanzong ordered the re-determination of the Confucius, Zheng Erjia, Liu Zhiji, Sima Zhen and others engaged in a heated debate, and the controversy between Kong and Zheng did not end. In view of this, Li Longji began to prepare for the re-annotation of the Book of filial piety, which is the continuation and reproduction of the convention of Xiao Yan's Note of Xiao Yan of the Liang Dynasty. Li Longji, out of both political and academic considerations, established the "Zheng Note" as the principal. The basic standpoint of "Kong Zhuan", and referring to the various theories, took three years to complete and promulgate the "Book of filial piety" in the ten years of Kaiyuan (722), which was called "Kaiyuan Ben". Kaiyuan Ben was rerevised in the second year of Tianbao (743), which was the second time that Li Longji revised the annotated Book of filial piety, and printed the Book of filial piety in the four years of Tianbao (745) in stone, that is, the extant Shitai Book of filial piety. Tianbao five-year (746) filial piety note was revised for the third time and promulgated at home and abroad. Yuan line Chongshu text is based on "Kaiyuan Ben", Yuan obeys the principle of "not refuting notes", mainly concentrated on the interpretation of cultural relics regulations, and played very little in the righteousness of imperial annotations. Li Longji's thoughts in the Book of filial piety contain three more prominent categories, namely, filial piety and filial piety, love and respect, loyalty and filial piety. Filial piety and filial piety are important distinctions between Zheng Xuan and Wang Su. What Li Longji focuses on is the implementation of the principle of "filial piety", so the enlightenment significance and sacred color of "filial piety" cannot be ignored. Therefore, Wang Su thought that filial piety is filial piety. Love, respect for the meaning of the Eastern Jin and Southern dynasties scholars are keen to discuss the topic, the Sui Dynasty continued the Southern Dynasty "love before respect" thinking; to the Tang Dynasty Li Longji "the Book of filial piety" after the passage, a contrary to Liu Xuan and others Chen said, put forward the "first respect then love" view. As for the distinction of loyalty and filial piety, it has long been a topic of discussion since the end of the Han Dynasty. In the two Jin and Southern dynasties, scholars generally held the standard position of "filial piety before loyalty", and Li Longji's "the Book of filial piety" intended to emphasize loyalty. And complete the grafting of "transfer filial piety into loyalty". The study of Li Longji's the Book of filial piety cannot but involve Xing f: Shu. Xing f of the Northern Song Dynasty: based on Li Longji's Notes on the Book of filial piety, in line with the principle of "obeying the principle of giving priority to, slightly abridging", the Yuan lines were sorted out, thus maintaining the authority of Li Longji's notes. It can be said that "the Book of filial piety" can fuse "Kongzhuan", Zheng annotated Ben, become one of the most popular classics in the history of Confucianism, and also closely related to the official compliance and approval of Song Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B241
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘增光;;刘炫《孝经述议》与魏晋南北朝《孝经》学——兼论《古文孝经孔传》的成书时间[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2015年03期
2 陈壁生;;经义与政教——以《孝经》“天地之性人为贵”为例[J];中国哲学史;2015年02期
3 潘忠伟;;从东晋朝政看《孝经》郑注地位上升的缘由[J];重庆理工大学学报(社会科学);2015年01期
4 刘九勇;;论《孝经》中的政治内涵[J];孔子研究;2014年04期
5 景亚鹂;王原茵;;西安碑林藏唐《石台孝经》述略[J];乾陵文化研究;2014年00期
6 刘增光;;《古文孝经孔传》为伪新证——以《孔传》与《管子》之关系的揭示为基础[J];云南大学学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
7 刘增光;;从良知学到《孝经》学——阳明心学发展的一个侧面[J];中国哲学史;2013年01期
8 刘增光;;朱熹《孝经》学探微三题——从元明学者的理解看[J];杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2013年01期
9 陈壁生;;明皇改经与《孝经》学的转折[J];中国哲学史;2012年02期
10 舒大刚;;邢f:《孝经注疏》栜e7[J];宋代文化研究;2010年00期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 季庆阳;唐代孝文化研究[D];陕西师范大学;2011年
，本文编号：2397788
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2397788.html
