当前网络共同体建构理路的“批评”与“自我批评”——兼谈网络空间命运共同体何以可能

发布时间：2019-01-12 07:30

【摘要】：自滕尼斯系统性表述"共同体"概念以降,西方学者对"我们应当如何共处"的思考基本循着功利主义和自由主义这两种目的论的理路。个体利益(意志)先在于"集体善"的理论起点。这种根植于资本主义生产方式之上的个人本位,放大了个体对物的占有的渴望,使得网络共同体内的交往关系更加被扭曲和异化。而网络空间命运共同体的提出,正是对信息时代下人在非神圣形象中的自我异化的反思和批判。但当前看来,网络空间命运共同体的建构理路中也存在着辩证唯物主义认识简单化以及历史唯物主义解构性理解的问题。因此,为了重塑网络空间命运共同体内平等真诚的交往关系,必须要求我们把握现实中矛盾之间必要的张力,以及坚定无产阶级的革命主体地位,这样才能在建构网络空间命运共同体的过程中,真正创新和发展信息时代下的马克思主义。
[Abstract]:Since Tonnies systematically expressed the concept of "community", Western scholars' thinking of "how we should coexist" basically followed the rational path of utilitarianism and liberalism. Individual interest (will) lies first in the theoretical starting point of collective good. This kind of individual standard rooted in the capitalist mode of production magnifies the individual's desire for possession of things and makes the communication relationship in the network community more distorted and alienated. The concept of cyberspace destiny community is the reflection and criticism of self-alienation in non-sacred image in the information age. At present, however, there are some problems in the construction of cyberspace destiny community, such as the simplification of dialectical materialism and the deconstruction of historical materialism. Therefore, in order to reshape the relationship of equal and sincere communication within the cyberspace destiny community, we must grasp the necessary tension between contradictions in reality and strengthen the status of the proletariat as the revolutionary subject. Only in this way can we really innovate and develop Marxism in the information age in the process of constructing the community of destiny in cyberspace.
【作者单位】：西北工业大学马克思主义学院;西北工业大学;西北工业大学人文与经法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金西部项目“结构功能主义视角下行政自由裁量的公共性研究”(15XKS011) 陕西省社科基金项目“网络语言对提升大学生思想政治教育有效性的研究”(2015A026)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B089.1

【参考文献】