孟、庄“为官之道”比较研究
[Abstract]:Since ancient times, our country has attached great importance to the moral construction of national public officials, through the formulation of various rules to restrain officials' words and deeds, in recent years, anti-corruption efforts are gradually strengthened. In fact, the term "official virtue" was not only put forward recently. As early as in ancient China, thinkers formed their own understanding of the way of being an official, including the thought of "to govern by virtue" and "to govern by virtue". The Mencius and Zhuangzi we are going to study are both living in the great social environment of the warring States period, fighting for hegemony. They have expressed their unique views on the road of becoming an official through their own understanding or positive or lateral expression, not only that. This is their ideal pursuit of morality. This paper attempts to analyze Mencius and Zhuangzi's way of becoming an official from the angle of inheritance and development by quoting the official moral thoughts of Confucius and Laozi. Among them, when studying the thoughts of Mencius and Zhuang, it starts from the connotation of their own thoughts. Through their expression of personal morality and the pursuit of ideal personality to their views on the construction of officials' moral thought, the author abstracts Mencius and Zhuangzi's official moral thought, which is creative and enlightening. On the basis of inheriting Confucius thought, Mencius fused the background of the warring States period. Most of them gave positive encouragement or criticism to those in power in order to make the princes and literati realize the importance of the people. Make it clean and fair in the process of administration. On the basis of inheriting Laozi's thought, combined with his thought of traveling the world in the essence of his thought, Zhuangzi further criticized the current politics from the side of fable and sarcasm. In fact, Zhuangzi's unashamed and reverse thinking just reflected his deep thought of official morality. Mencius and Zhuangzi represent two different political thoughts of Confucianism and Taoism respectively. They have their own ways to solve social problems, and the interest groups they represent are also very different. However, their understanding of the essence of the principle of being an official is similar, and the ideological connotations of the Confucian and Taoist "internal, holy and external kings" embody mutual understanding. By studying the political thoughts of the sages, this paper absorbs beneficial elements from the traditional Chinese culture with Confucianism and Taoism as the main body, and enlightens the officials to form the spirit of honesty, fairness, selflessness and dedication. At the same time, the comparison of Menzhuang's thought from the angle of being an official also endows Mengzhuang's thought with the characteristics of the times.
【学位授予单位】:曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:B222.5;B223.5
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 程冰艳;;从“无用之用”看文学[J];安徽文学(下半月);2007年11期
2 齐芳芳;;老子的自然思想[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年10期
3 王逊;;《庄子·逍遥游》篇鲲、鹏、蜩、蝉形象再考察[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年05期
4 何小五;;体道之境——庄子“心斋说”浅析[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年05期
5 李成玉;;生死齐一——浅析庄子生命观[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年08期
6 李成玉;;庄子生命意识初探[J];安康学院学报;2009年04期
7 蒋泽枫;;论传统老庄虚无思想对无政府主义在中国传播的影响[J];白城师范学院学报;2006年01期
8 张婧;;中国传统文化与大学生的素质教育[J];白城师范学院学报;2009年01期
9 孙葛佳;;初探黑龙江地方史与大学生思想建设之关系[J];边疆经济与文化;2009年12期
10 张和平;;释“以明”[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2009年05期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 马鸿;;中国古代传统和谐思想及其现代意蕴[A];2008年度上海市社会科学界第六届学术年会文集(哲学·历史·文学学科卷)[C];2008年
2 蔡馥生;姚建华;孔陈焱;;试论和谐文化引领宗教与社会主义社会相适应[A];和谐文化与统一战线——全国首次统战文化论坛论文集[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 王晓雪;先秦兵家治国思想研究[D];南开大学;2010年
2 刘红红;庄子思想与魏晋时期中国文艺的自觉[D];暨南大学;2010年
3 孙敏明;庄子“游”的人生哲学研究[D];浙江大学;2011年
4 郧在廷;西汉思想政治教育模式研究[D];首都师范大学;2011年
5 李希;郭象哲学与中古的自然审美[D];吉林大学;2011年
6 李兆良;宽恕内涵的本土心理学反思[D];吉林大学;2011年
7 刘白明;老庄正义思想研究[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
8 林苏闽;西汉儒学的自然主义转型董仲舒哲学研究[D];复旦大学;2011年
9 高方;《左传》文学论[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2011年
10 曾小明;魏晋名士的身心观[D];湖南大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 胡斯源;大学生生命教育探索[D];中国海洋大学;2010年
2 何月燕;土楼文化及其教育功能研究[D];福建师范大学;2010年
3 高登;戚继光兵儒合一思想研究[D];山东师范大学;2011年
4 谷怡然;论曹松的思想及诗艺[D];首都师范大学;2011年
5 刘苗;庄子的“反知”与“真知”[D];西南大学;2011年
6 Aaron Kalman(龙爱仁);先秦儒、道和古希伯来之生死观比较[D];浙江大学;2011年
7 王维国;墨子“尚同”思想与当代中国和谐社会建设[D];山东大学;2011年
8 方晓东;当代大学生生命教育研究[D];广西师范大学;2011年
9 李娅;当代大学生生命教育实践探究[D];南京师范大学;2011年
10 孟七应;儒学时代价值:社会主义核心价值体系构建的深厚底蕴[D];西北师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:2415713
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2415713.html