社会主义论证方式问题探讨
发布时间：2019-03-02 15:19
【摘要】：马克思的文本逻辑被解释为历史唯物主义的"科学"逻辑与人道主义的"伦理性"逻辑,这两种理论逻辑隐含着两种不同的社会主义论证方式,即"是"或者客观的方式,以及"应当"或者主观的方式。这两种论证方式的错误是显而易见的。社会主义论证的问题仍然是如何在承认历史科学的前提下保存历史主体的视角和革命动力的问题。
[Abstract]:Marx's text logic is interpreted as the "scientific" logic of historical materialism and the "ethical" logic of humanitarianism. These two theoretical logic imply two different ways of socialist argumentation, that is, "yes" or "objective". And "should" or subjective ways. The errors in these two ways of argument are obvious. The problem of socialist argumentation is still how to preserve the perspective of historical subject and revolutionary motive force on the premise of acknowledging historical science.
【作者单位】： 南开大学哲学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目(项目编号:12CZX063) 天津市教委社科重大项目(项目编号:2012ZD)的中期成果
【分类号】：B03
本文编号：2433175
[Abstract]:Marx's text logic is interpreted as the "scientific" logic of historical materialism and the "ethical" logic of humanitarianism. These two theoretical logic imply two different ways of socialist argumentation, that is, "yes" or "objective". And "should" or subjective ways. The errors in these two ways of argument are obvious. The problem of socialist argumentation is still how to preserve the perspective of historical subject and revolutionary motive force on the premise of acknowledging historical science.
【作者单位】： 南开大学哲学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目(项目编号:12CZX063) 天津市教委社科重大项目(项目编号:2012ZD)的中期成果
【分类号】：B03
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 马俊峰;;社会规范合理性的论证方式及其比较[J];哲学研究;2012年07期
，本文编号：2433175
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2433175.html
