何为哲学——对王路教授评论的若干回应
发布时间：2019-03-03 08:56
【摘要】：如何理解哲学?对这一问题往往存在不同理解。王路教授对拙作的异议,也涉及理解上的差异。就王路教授所质疑的智慧而言,作为哲学范畴的智慧不同于知识的基本点,就在于以跨越界限的方式去理解这一世界。智慧不仅仅限于"是什么"或逻辑、语义层面真的追求,而是同时以善和美为关切的对象,对真善美的这种关切包含着价值内涵。就形而上学而言,王路教授强调形而上学研究"是"本身,但以"是"表述形而上学的问题,容易将哲学层面对形而上学问题的讨论引向语言和逻辑的视域。除了将形而上学的对象主要限于"是"本身之外,王路教授还一再将其与"先验性"联系起来,然而,哲学作为把握世界的理论形态,很难仅仅囿于先验之域。哲学在形式的层面涉及概念分析。分析哲学虽有见于概念分析的意义,但每每由强调概念的逻辑分析而将概念的这种运作本身作为哲学的主要乃至全部工作,与之相应,如何达到真实的世界并赋予概念分析以智慧的内涵,往往处于其视野之外。
[Abstract]:How to understand philosophy? There is often a different understanding of the problem. Professor Wang Lu's objection to his poor work also involves differences in understanding. As far as the wisdom questioned by Professor Wang Lu is concerned, the wisdom as a philosophical category is different from the basic point of knowledge, which lies in understanding the world in a way that transcends the boundary. Wisdom is not limited to "what" or logic, the semantic level of true pursuit, but at the same time to good and beauty as the object of concern, this concern for truth, good and beauty contains value connotation. As far as metaphysics is concerned, Professor Wang Lu emphasizes that metaphysical research "is" itself, but expressing metaphysical problems with "yes" is easy to lead the philosophical discussion of metaphysics to the perspective of language and logic. In addition to limiting the metaphysical object to "Yes" itself, Professor Wang Lu has repeatedly linked it to "transcendence". However, philosophy, as the theoretical form of grasping the world, is difficult to be confined to the domain of transcendence. Philosophy involves conceptual analysis at the formal level. Although analytical philosophy has the meaning of being seen in conceptual analysis, the operation of the concept itself is often regarded as the main or even the whole work of philosophy by emphasizing the logical analysis of the concept, and corresponding to it. How to achieve the real world and endow conceptual analysis with the connotation of wisdom is often out of sight.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所暨哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“事与物:古今中西之争视域下中国现代形而上学的转换”(16JJD720007) 国家社会科学基金重大项目“冯契哲学文献整理与思想研究”(15ZDB012) 江苏省“公民道德与社会风尚协同创新中心”研究项目 上海社会科学创新基地华东师范大学“文化观念与核心价值”项目
【分类号】：B01
本文编号：2433558
[Abstract]:How to understand philosophy? There is often a different understanding of the problem. Professor Wang Lu's objection to his poor work also involves differences in understanding. As far as the wisdom questioned by Professor Wang Lu is concerned, the wisdom as a philosophical category is different from the basic point of knowledge, which lies in understanding the world in a way that transcends the boundary. Wisdom is not limited to "what" or logic, the semantic level of true pursuit, but at the same time to good and beauty as the object of concern, this concern for truth, good and beauty contains value connotation. As far as metaphysics is concerned, Professor Wang Lu emphasizes that metaphysical research "is" itself, but expressing metaphysical problems with "yes" is easy to lead the philosophical discussion of metaphysics to the perspective of language and logic. In addition to limiting the metaphysical object to "Yes" itself, Professor Wang Lu has repeatedly linked it to "transcendence". However, philosophy, as the theoretical form of grasping the world, is difficult to be confined to the domain of transcendence. Philosophy involves conceptual analysis at the formal level. Although analytical philosophy has the meaning of being seen in conceptual analysis, the operation of the concept itself is often regarded as the main or even the whole work of philosophy by emphasizing the logical analysis of the concept, and corresponding to it. How to achieve the real world and endow conceptual analysis with the connotation of wisdom is often out of sight.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所暨哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“事与物:古今中西之争视域下中国现代形而上学的转换”(16JJD720007) 国家社会科学基金重大项目“冯契哲学文献整理与思想研究”(15ZDB012) 江苏省“公民道德与社会风尚协同创新中心”研究项目 上海社会科学创新基地华东师范大学“文化观念与核心价值”项目
【分类号】：B01
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 倪梁康;;回应王路[J];中国现象学与哲学评论;2009年00期
2 江怡;规范的建立与思想的深刻——兼评王路的《走进分析哲学》[J];哲学研究;2000年03期
3 蔡祥元;;“存在”译法是一种误译吗——回应王路先生对“存在”译法的质疑[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
4 江怡;;为分析哲学一辩——评王路的《走进分析哲学》[J];社会科学管理与评论;2000年02期
5 张桂权;“真”能代替“真理”吗?——就“真理”和“真”的辨别及译名问题与王路先生商榷[J];世界哲学;2003年01期
6 王晓朝;eimi——卡恩的希腊ontology的语言学导论——与王路教授商榷[J];学术月刊;2004年06期
7 王路;论“真”与“真理”[J];中国社会科学;1996年06期
，本文编号：2433558
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2433558.html
