中国哲学中的体用义
发布时间：2019-06-17 08:03
【摘要】：体用论在中国哲学中运用甚广,是儒、释、道三家共同使用的思想范畴,然体用这对范畴在传统的哲学文献中仍有不同的指义。为了清楚地了解体用论的渊源及使用,现简要梳理哲学史上重要学者对"体用"范畴的使用,并考察其中有何不同的强调与转变。为了使讨论的焦点能更形集中,对宋以前、宋代及明代对"体用"范畴的使用作初步的讨论,以说明"体用"的意义类型,及其是否在哲学史中有所新创。之所以以宋明为界,是因为宋代以前的体用论述多见于道家及佛家的论说中,而宋代是理学家使用体用说最多的时代,宋代以后三教之学渐有混同合一之论,故其"体用"之说也有新的发展。在上述的时间划分下,宋以前的思想家以王弼为主要的参照对象,宋以后以朱熹为主,而明代则专论方以智一人。
[Abstract]:The theory of body use is widely used in Chinese philosophy, which is a common ideological category of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. However, the use of body still has different meanings in the traditional philosophical literature. In order to clearly understand the origin and use of the theory of physical use, this paper briefly combs the use of the category of "physical use" by important scholars in the history of philosophy, and examines the different emphasis and transformation among them. In order to make the focus of the discussion more focused, this paper makes a preliminary discussion on the use of the category of "body use" before Song Dynasty, Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty, in order to explain the meaning type of "body use" and whether it has made any new creation in the history of philosophy. The reason for taking Song Ming as the boundary is that the discussion of physical use before the Song Dynasty was more common in the theories of Taoism and Buddhism, and the Song Dynasty was the era when physicists had the most use of physicists. After the Song Dynasty, the theory of the three religions was gradually mixed and unified, so the theory of "physical use" also had new development. Under the above time division, the thinkers before Song Dynasty took Wang Bi as the main reference object, Zhu Xi as the main reference object after Song Dynasty, and Fang Yizhi as a monograph in Ming Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 台湾大学中国文学系;
【分类号】：B21
本文编号：2500829
[Abstract]:The theory of body use is widely used in Chinese philosophy, which is a common ideological category of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. However, the use of body still has different meanings in the traditional philosophical literature. In order to clearly understand the origin and use of the theory of physical use, this paper briefly combs the use of the category of "physical use" by important scholars in the history of philosophy, and examines the different emphasis and transformation among them. In order to make the focus of the discussion more focused, this paper makes a preliminary discussion on the use of the category of "body use" before Song Dynasty, Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty, in order to explain the meaning type of "body use" and whether it has made any new creation in the history of philosophy. The reason for taking Song Ming as the boundary is that the discussion of physical use before the Song Dynasty was more common in the theories of Taoism and Buddhism, and the Song Dynasty was the era when physicists had the most use of physicists. After the Song Dynasty, the theory of the three religions was gradually mixed and unified, so the theory of "physical use" also had new development. Under the above time division, the thinkers before Song Dynasty took Wang Bi as the main reference object, Zhu Xi as the main reference object after Song Dynasty, and Fang Yizhi as a monograph in Ming Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 台湾大学中国文学系;
【分类号】：B21
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 力涛;宋代以前体用范畴的历史演变[J];学术论坛;1991年03期
2 陈峗;从“贵体贱用”到“相与为体”——中国体用哲学的范式转换[J];许昌学院学报;2003年01期
3 李晓春;;王弼“体用论”述真[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
4 赵恒法;;邵雍的体用论[J];孝感学院学报;2009年S1期
5 林采佑;略谈王弼体用范畴之原义──“有体无用”之“用体论”[J];哲学研究;1996年11期
，本文编号：2500829
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2500829.html
